Ayllu-Siaf

Editorial Themata

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Ayllu-Siaf is an open-access journal published by Editorial Themata in Spain, publishing in SPANISH and ENGLISH and FRENCH and PORTUGUESE. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 12 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Editorial Themata
ISSN
2695-5938 · 2695-5946
Country
Spain
Languages
SPANISH, ENGLISH, FRENCH, PORTUGUESE
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
86
Declared review time
12 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2022-05-31
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
12 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Dormant — no works recorded since 2021
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

86

Most recent article

20 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

12weeks

Works in OpenAlex

11

Last recorded publication year

2021

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

0

i10-index

0

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy8
Last DOAJ review date
2022-05-31
Added to DOAJ
2022-05-31
Declared plagiarism screening
Declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
0%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
0%
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification6

Subjects (DOAJ)

Philosophy. Psychology. ReligionFine ArtsGeography. Anthropology. Recreation: Anthropology

LCC codes

BNGN1-890

Subject areas

  • Economic and Social Development
  • Economic and Social Development
  • Law, Ethics, and AI Impact
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Law, Ethics, and AI Impact
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Education and Teacher Training
  • Philosophy and Phenomenology Studies
Show all subjects (30)
  • Comparative International Legal Studies
  • Immigration and Intercultural Education
  • Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences and Policies
  • Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Philosophy, Health, and Society
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Education and Teacher Training
  • Educational Methods and Psychological Studies
  • Religious and Theological Studies
  • Philosophy and Phenomenology Studies
  • Social Sciences and Policies
  • Political Theory and Democracy
  • Immigration and Intercultural Education
  • Comparative International Legal Studies
  • Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Philosophy, Health, and Society
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Religious and Theological Studies
  • Educational Methods and Psychological Studies

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • philosophical anthropology
  • culture
  • anthropology
  • philosophy
  • literature

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: