Landscape review

Lincoln University

Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Landscape review is an open-access journal published by Lincoln University in New Zealand. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared publication charge: 0. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Lincoln University
ISSN
2253-1440 · 1173-3853
Country
New Zealand
Access
Open access
Declared publication charge
0

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2024-02-13
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
0
Declared review time (DOAJ)
—
Activity (OpenAlex)
Dormant — no works recorded since 2016
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Works in OpenAlex

11

Last recorded publication year

2019

Reported by OpenAlex in 2 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

1

i10-index

0

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy2
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-09-21
PKP PN
Norwegian register (HK-dir)— 2011
Level 1 — approved scholarly channel
Identity & continuity2
Alternate titles
Asia-Pacific journal of landscape architecture.
Source type
journal
Classification(no data)

No data available to the platform for this group

No platform data for: Classification — absence is not a judgment about the journal.

Subject areas

  • Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
  • Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
  • Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
  • Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
  • Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • American Environmental and Regional History
  • Urban Planning and Landscape Design
Show all subjects (42)
  • Urbanization and City Planning
  • Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
  • Race, History, and American Society
  • Law in Society and Culture
  • Educational Leadership and Practices
  • Philippine History and Culture
  • Urban Planning and Governance
  • Archaeology and Natural History
  • Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
  • Cuban History and Society
  • Geographies of human-animal interactions
  • Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
  • Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis
  • Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
  • Theatre and Performance Studies
  • Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • American Environmental and Regional History
  • Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
  • Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • Urban Planning and Landscape Design
  • Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
  • Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
  • Cuban History and Society
  • Geographies of human-animal interactions
  • Urban Planning and Governance
  • Educational Leadership and Practices
  • Law in Society and Culture
  • Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
  • Archaeology and Natural History
  • Philippine History and Culture
  • Race, History, and American Society
  • Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis
  • Urbanization and City Planning
  • Theatre and Performance Studies

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • landscape architecture
  • oceania
  • land development

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: