Patristica et Mediaevalia

Universidad de Buenos Aires

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Patristica et Mediaevalia is an open-access journal published by Universidad de Buenos Aires in Argentina, publishing in SPANISH and PORTUGUESE and ITALIAN and GERMAN. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 15 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Universidad de Buenos Aires
ISSN
0325-2280 · 2683-9636
Country
Argentina
Languages
SPANISH, PORTUGUESE, ITALIAN, GERMAN
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
451
Declared review time
15 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2020-10-13
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
15 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2025
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

451

Most recent article

10 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

15weeks

Works in OpenAlex

151

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

3

i10-index

1

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy9
Last DOAJ review date
2021-02-18
Added to DOAJ
2020-10-13
Declared plagiarism screening
Not declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
PKP PN
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
0%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
0%
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification4

Subjects (DOAJ)

General Works: History of scholarship and learning. The humanitiesPhilosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)

LCC codes

AZ20-999B1-5802

Subject areas

  • Medieval Philosophy and Theology
  • Medieval Philosophy and Theology
  • Medieval Philosophy and Theology
  • Medieval Literature and History
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Augustinian Studies and Theology
  • Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
  • Medieval and Classical Philosophy
Show all subjects (75)
  • Historical Economic and Legal Thought
  • Religious and Theological Studies
  • Religious and Theological Studies
  • Byzantine Studies and History
  • Historical Philosophy and Science
  • Augustinian Studies and Theology
  • Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Augustinian Studies and Theology
  • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Catholicism and Religious Studies
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies
  • Historical and Religious Studies of Rome
  • Historical Philosophy and Science
  • Historical Philosophy and Science
  • Medieval Iberian Studies
  • Biographical and Historical Analysis
  • Classical Studies and Legal History
  • Classical Studies and Legal History
  • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
  • Medieval Iberian Studies
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Karl Barth and Christian Theology
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Historical and Linguistic Studies
  • Historical Economic and Legal Thought
  • Historical and Linguistic Studies
  • Medieval Iberian Studies
  • Byzantine Studies and History
  • Medieval and Classical Philosophy
  • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
  • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
  • Byzantine Studies and History
  • Theology and Canon Law Studies
  • Theology and Canon Law Studies
  • Medieval and Classical Philosophy
  • History of Medicine Studies
  • Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
  • Philosophical Thought and Analysis
  • Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
  • Medieval European Literature and History
  • Latin American history and culture
  • Philosophy, Health, and Society
  • Philosophical Thought and Analysis
  • Medieval and Early Modern Justice
  • Colonialism, slavery, and trade
  • Cultural and Mythological Studies
  • Thoreau and American Literature
  • Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books
  • Religious, Philosophical, and Educational Studies
  • Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books
  • Cultural and Mythological Studies
  • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
  • Religious, Philosophical, and Educational Studies
  • Historical Economic and Legal Thought
  • Archaeological and Historical Studies
  • Archaeological and Historical Studies
  • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
  • Medieval and Early Modern Iberia
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Medieval Literature and History
  • Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
  • Architecture and Art History Studies
  • Philosophy, Health, and Society

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • medieval philosophy
  • humanities
  • middle ages
  • medieval thought

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: