Sykepleien

Not yet evaluated

About the journal

Sykepleien is a journal in Norway. It is listed in PUBMED according to the sources read. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

ISSN
1892-6304 · 0806-7511
Country
Norway
Access
Not open access / not declared

Index listings

  • PUBMED · 1997-03-11
Indexing
PUBMED
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
—
Activity (OpenAlex)
Dormant — no works recorded since 2014
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Works in OpenAlex

59

Last recorded publication year

2014

Reported by OpenAlex in 0 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

2

i10-index

0

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy2
Open references deposited at Crossref
0%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
0%
Identity & continuity2
Alternate titles
Sykepleien magasinSykepleienSykepleien jobbNSF-politikk
Source type
journal
Classification(no data)

No data available to the platform for this group

No platform data for: Classification — absence is not a judgment about the journal.

Subject areas

  • Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research
  • Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research
  • European and International Law Studies
  • European and International Law Studies
  • Social and Educational Sciences
  • Social and Educational Sciences
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Healthcare Systems and Challenges
Show all subjects (50)
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Healthcare Systems and Challenges
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Child and Adolescent Health
  • Child and Adolescent Health
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Empathy and Medical Education
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Empathy and Medical Education
  • Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Research in Social Sciences
  • Research in Social Sciences
  • Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Nursing education and management
  • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Media Studies and Communication
  • Labor Movements and Unions
  • Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Translation Studies and Practices
  • Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Translation Studies and Practices
  • Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Nursing education and management
  • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Media Studies and Communication
  • Labor Movements and Unions
  • Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: