Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal

Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal is an open-access journal published by Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal in Brazil, publishing in ITALIAN and SPANISH and ENGLISH and PORTUGUESE. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 5 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal
ISSN
2674-5739 · 2674-5755
Country
Brazil
Languages
ITALIAN, SPANISH, ENGLISH, PORTUGUESE
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
192
Declared review time
5 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2021-03-14
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
5 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2025
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

192

Most recent article

10 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

5weeks

Works in OpenAlex

179

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

2

i10-index

0

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy9
Last DOAJ review date
2021-03-14
Added to DOAJ
2021-03-14
Declared plagiarism screening
Not declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
0%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
56%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification2

Subjects (DOAJ)

Law: Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence

LCC codes

K1-7720

Subject areas

  • Brazilian Legal Issues
  • Brazilian Legal Issues
  • Brazilian Legal Issues
  • Legal Education and Practice Innovations
  • Criminal Law and Policy
  • Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Public Health in Brazil
  • Social and Political Issues
Show all subjects (75)
  • Social and Political Issues
  • Public Health in Brazil
  • Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
  • Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
  • Geological Modeling and Analysis
  • Geological Modeling and Analysis
  • Electrical and Electromagnetic Research
  • Electrical and Electromagnetic Research
  • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Legal processes and jurisprudence
  • Academic Research in Diverse Fields
  • Legal and Social Justice Studies
  • Judicial and Constitutional Studies
  • Academic Research in Diverse Fields
  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social and Political Issues
  • Gender, Violence, Rights in Latin America
  • Family and Matrimonial Law
  • Labor Law and Work Dynamics
  • Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Race, Identity, and Education in Brazil
  • Education and Public Policy
  • Education and Public Policy
  • Youth, Drugs, and Violence
  • Race, Identity, and Education in Brazil
  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Youth, Drugs, and Violence
  • Race, Identity, and Education in Brazil
  • Education, Law, and Society
  • Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
  • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Rural Development and Agriculture
  • Public Health in Brazil
  • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social and Economic Solidarity
  • Rural Development and Agriculture
  • Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges
  • Brazilian cultural history and politics
  • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Legal processes and jurisprudence
  • Legal processes and jurisprudence
  • Social and Economic Solidarity
  • Brazilian cultural history and politics
  • Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
  • Geological and Geophysical Studies
  • Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
  • Linguistics and Education Research
  • Geological and Geophysical Studies
  • Hearing Impairment and Communication
  • Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
  • Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
  • Administrative Law and Governance
  • Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Linguistics and Education Research
  • Gender, Sexuality, and Education
  • Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
  • Literature, Culture, and Criticism
  • Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Gender, Sexuality, and Education
  • Judicial and Constitutional Studies
  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
  • Literature, Culture, and Criticism
  • Judicial and Constitutional Studies

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • access to justice
  • public defense
  • sociology
  • law
  • legal pluralism
  • public defensorship

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: