Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift

Scandinavian University Press

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift is an open-access journal published by Scandinavian University Press in Norway, publishing in NORWEGIAN NYNORSK and NORWEGIAN BOKMÅL. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 52 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Scandinavian University Press
ISSN
0029-1943 · 1504-2901
Country
Norway
Languages
NORWEGIAN NYNORSK, NORWEGIAN BOKMÅL
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
194
Declared review time
52 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2017-11-21
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
52 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2025
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

194

Most recent article

4 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

52weeks

Works in OpenAlex

553

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

11

i10-index

11

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy12
Last DOAJ review date
2026-03-17
Added to DOAJ
2017-11-21
Declared plagiarism screening
Not declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Declared digital preservation
Portico
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
Portico
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Norwegian register (HK-dir)— 2026
Level 1 — approved scholarly channel
Open references deposited at Crossref
83%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
0%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification2

Subjects (DOAJ)

Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)

LCC codes

B1-5802

Subject areas

  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research
  • Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Philosophical Thought and Analysis
  • Philosophy, Science, and History
Show all subjects (75)
  • Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • European and International Law Studies
  • European and International Law Studies
  • Social and Educational Sciences
  • Social and Educational Sciences
  • Philosophy and Historical Thought
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Critical Theory and Philosophy
  • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
  • Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
  • Philosophy and Literary Analysis
  • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
  • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
  • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
  • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
  • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
  • Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Philosophy, History, and Historiography
  • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
  • Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence
  • Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence
  • Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
  • Education, Philosophy, and Society
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Critical Theory and Philosophy
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Critical Theory and Philosophy
  • Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
  • Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
  • Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Narrative Theory and Analysis
  • Narrative Theory and Analysis
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Simone de Beauvoir and Sartre
  • Foucault, Power, and Ethics
  • Foucault, Power, and Ethics
  • Simone de Beauvoir and Sartre
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • philosophy
  • norwegian philosophy
  • scandinavian philosophy

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: