Ephata

Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculdade de Teologia

Journal websitePeer review: Open review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Ephata is an open-access journal published by Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculdade de Teologia in Portugal, publishing in italian and french and spanish and english. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 12 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculdade de Teologia
ISSN
2184-5778 · 2795-4900
Country
Portugal
Languages
italian, french, spanish, english
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
153
Declared review time
12 weeks
Declared peer-review model
open_review

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2021-03-01
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
12 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Dormant — no works recorded since 2019
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

153

Most recent article

8 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

12weeks

Works in OpenAlex

10

Last recorded publication year

2019

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

1

i10-index

0

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy9
Last DOAJ review date
2025-05-25
Added to DOAJ
2021-03-01
Declared plagiarism screening
Declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
PKP PN
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
0%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
0%
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification4

Subjects (DOAJ)

Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Practical TheologyPhilosophy. Psychology. Religion: Doctrinal Theology

LCC codes

BV1-5099BT10-1480

Subject areas

  • Religion and Society in Latin America
  • Religion and Society in Latin America
  • Religious and Theological Studies
  • Religious and Theological Studies
  • Philosophical and Historical Studies
  • Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
  • Education and Public Policy
  • Health, Education, and Cultural Studies
Show all subjects (24)
  • Catholicism, Bioethics, Media, Education
  • Literary and Philosophical Studies
  • Italian Literature and Culture
  • Business and Management Studies
  • Psychological Treatments and Disorders
  • Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
  • Literary and Philosophical Studies
  • Catholicism, Bioethics, Media, Education
  • Philosophical and Historical Studies
  • Social and Economic Solidarity
  • Health, Education, and Cultural Studies
  • Education and Public Policy
  • Italian Literature and Culture
  • Business and Management Studies
  • Psychological Treatments and Disorders
  • Social and Economic Solidarity

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • theology
  • religion
  • christianity
  • systematic theology
  • practical theology
  • historical theology

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: