Revista Latinoamericana de Bioética

Editorial Neogranadina

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Revista Latinoamericana de Bioética is an open-access journal published by Editorial Neogranadina in Colombia, publishing in SPANISH and PORTUGUESE and ENGLISH. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 20 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Editorial Neogranadina
ISSN
1657-4702 · 2462-859X
Country
Colombia
Languages
SPANISH, PORTUGUESE, ENGLISH
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
828
Declared review time
20 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2016-11-03
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
20 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2025
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

828

Most recent article

4 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

20weeks

Works in OpenAlex

539

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

12

i10-index

19

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy11
Last DOAJ review date
2021-08-16
Added to DOAJ
2016-11-03
Declared plagiarism screening
Declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Declared digital preservation
Portico
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
CLOCKSSPortico
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
91%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
91%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity2
Alternate titles
RLBI
Source type
journal
Classification4

Subjects (DOAJ)

Medicine: Medicine (General): Medical philosophy. Medical ethicsPhilosophy. Psychology. Religion: Ethics

LCC codes

R723-726BJ1-1725

Subject areas

  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Bioethics and Human Rights Issues
  • Medical and Health Sciences Research
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
Show all subjects (75)
  • Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Law, Ethics, and AI Impact
  • Law, Ethics, and AI Impact
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Medicine, History, and Philosophy
  • Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Public Health in Brazil
  • Public Health in Brazil
  • Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
  • Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
  • Empathy and Medical Education
  • Empathy and Medical Education
  • Organ Donation and Transplantation
  • Philosophical and Cultural Analysis
  • Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
  • Health, Medicine and Society
  • Health, Nursing, Elderly Care
  • Health, Nursing, Elderly Care
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Animal Law and Welfare
  • Empathy and Medical Education
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Organ Donation and Transplantation
  • Patient Dignity and Privacy
  • Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Patient Dignity and Privacy
  • Organ Donation and Transplantation
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
  • Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
  • Psychology and Mental Health
  • Environmental Sustainability and Education
  • Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Environmental Sustainability and Education
  • Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social and Economic Solidarity
  • Higher Education and Sustainability
  • Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social and Economic Solidarity
  • Higher Education and Sustainability
  • Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health and Medical Education
  • Science, Research, and Medicine
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Health and Medical Education
  • Science and Education Research
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Public Health Policies and Education
  • Science, Research, and Medicine
  • Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Political Philosophy and Ethics

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • bioethics
  • medical ethics
  • research ethics
  • biolaw
  • environmental ethics
  • ethics

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: