Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie und Praxis

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS)

Journal websitePeer review: Other
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie und Praxis is an open-access journal published by Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS) in Germany, publishing in english and german. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 16 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS)
ISSN
1619-7623 · 2199-9201
Country
Germany
Languages
english, german
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
2688
Declared review time
16 weeks
Declared peer-review model
other

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2006-04-27
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
16 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Dormant — no works recorded since 2021
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

2688

Most recent article

7 years ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

16weeks

Works in OpenAlex

2728

Last recorded publication year

2021

Reported by OpenAlex in 2 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

31

i10-index

115

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy8
Last DOAJ review date
2026-08-04
Added to DOAJ
2006-04-27
Declared plagiarism screening
Not declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
0%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
0%
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity3
Alternate titles
TATuPTheorie und PraxisTechnology assessment
Continued by
2568-020X
Source type
journal
Classification4

Subjects (DOAJ)

TechnologySocial Sciences

LCC codes

TH

Subject areas

  • Research, Science, and Academia
  • Environmental Science and Technology
  • Environmental Science and Technology
  • Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
  • Innovation, Technology, and Society
  • Innovation, Technology, and Society
  • Risk Perception and Management
  • Technology Assessment and Management
Show all subjects (75)
  • Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
  • Economic and Social Issues
  • Economic and Social Issues
  • Digital Innovation in Industries
  • Digital Innovation in Industries
  • Innovation, Technology, and Society
  • Public Administration and Political Analysis
  • Public Administration and Political Analysis
  • Technology, Environment, Urban Planning
  • Technology, Environment, Urban Planning
  • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Information Society and Technology Trends
  • Sociology and Education Studies
  • Sociology and Education Studies
  • Physics and Engineering Research Articles
  • Physics and Engineering Research Articles
  • Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies
  • Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies
  • transportation and logistics systems
  • Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry
  • Renewable Energy and Sustainability
  • Corporate Governance and Management
  • Corporate Governance and Management
  • Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Renewable Energy and Sustainability
  • Libraries and Information Services
  • Libraries and Information Services
  • Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
  • Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
  • Bioethics and Human Rights Issues
  • Renewable Energy and Sustainability
  • Climate Change and Sustainable Development
  • Human auditory perception and evaluation
  • ICT Impact and Policies
  • Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
  • Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Innovation Policy and R&D
  • Human auditory perception and evaluation
  • Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Technology Assessment and Management
  • Technology Assessment and Management
  • Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Medical and Health Sciences Research
  • Education Methods and Technologies
  • Medical and Health Sciences Research
  • Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
  • Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
  • Education Methods and Technologies
  • Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
  • Law and Political Science
  • Nanotechnology research and applications
  • Law and Political Science
  • Social and Demographic Issues in Germany
  • German Social Sciences and History
  • Social and Demographic Issues in Germany
  • Corporate Management and Leadership
  • Corporate Management and Leadership
  • Sports Science and Education
  • Sports Science and Education
  • Health and Medical Studies
  • Health and Medical Studies
  • Educational Reforms and Innovations
  • Educational Reforms and Innovations

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • technology assessment
  • system analysis
  • technology monitoring
  • innovation studies
  • future studies

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: