Debates do NER

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Journal websitePeer review: Other
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Debates do NER is an open-access journal published by Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul in Brazil, publishing in ENGLISH and PORTUGUESE and SPANISH. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 4 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
ISSN
1519-843X · 1982-8136
Country
Brazil
Languages
ENGLISH, PORTUGUESE, SPANISH
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
2
Declared review time
4 weeks
Declared peer-review model
other

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2015-05-07
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
4 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2025
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

2

Most recent article

11 years ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

4weeks

Works in OpenAlex

687

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

15

i10-index

26

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy9
Last DOAJ review date
2015-05-07
Added to DOAJ
2015-05-07
Declared plagiarism screening
Not declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
0%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
87%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity2
Alternate titles
Debates do Núcleo de Estudos da Religião
Source type
journal
Classification2

Subjects (DOAJ)

Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Religions. Mythology. Rationalism: Religion (General)

LCC codes

BL1-50

Subject areas

  • Religion and Society in Latin America
  • Religion and Society in Latin America
  • Religion and Society in Latin America
  • Religion and Society Interactions
  • Religious and Theological Studies
  • Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Urban and sociocultural dynamics
  • Urban and sociocultural dynamics
Show all subjects (75)
  • Social and Economic Solidarity
  • Social and Economic Solidarity
  • Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
  • Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
  • Race, Identity, and Education in Brazil
  • Religious Freedom and Discrimination
  • Catholicism and Religious Studies
  • Religion, Society, and Development
  • Religion and Society Interactions
  • Religion, Society, and Development
  • Religion and Society Interactions
  • Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies
  • Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies
  • Arts and Performance Studies
  • Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
  • Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
  • Food, Nutrition, and Cultural Practices
  • Food, Nutrition, and Cultural Practices
  • Religious Tourism and Spaces
  • Urban Development and Societal Issues
  • Urban Development and Societal Issues
  • Social and Political Issues
  • Political Dynamics in Latin America
  • Social and Political Issues
  • Religious Tourism and Spaces
  • Religious Tourism and Spaces
  • Literature, Culture, and Criticism
  • Media, Religion, Digital Communication
  • Literature, Culture, and Criticism
  • Psychology and Mental Health
  • Psychology and Mental Health
  • Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Sociology and Education in Brazil
  • Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Race, Identity, and Education in Brazil
  • Christian Theology and Mission
  • Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Politics and Society in Latin America
  • Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Religious and Theological Studies
  • Health, Education, and Cultural Studies
  • Religious and Theological Studies
  • Health, Education, and Cultural Studies
  • Race, Identity, and Education in Brazil
  • Youth, Drugs, and Violence
  • Youth, Politics, and Society
  • Environmental Sustainability and Education
  • Environmental Sustainability and Education
  • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Youth, Politics, and Society
  • Youth, Drugs, and Violence
  • Religious Education and Schools
  • Science and Science Education
  • Literature, Culture, and Criticism
  • Science and Science Education
  • History of Colonial Brazil
  • Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
  • Media, Religion, Digital Communication
  • Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
  • Religion and Sociopolitical Dynamics in Nigeria
  • Media, Religion, Digital Communication
  • Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Gender and Feminist Studies
  • History of Colonial Brazil
  • Linguistics and Education Research
  • Linguistics and Education Research
  • History of Colonial Brazil

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • anthropology
  • social sciences
  • religion
  • anthropology of religion
  • social anthropology

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: