Studia Iuridica

Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Studia Iuridica is an open-access journal in Poland, publishing in english. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

ISSN
0137-4346 · 2544-3135
Country
Poland
Languages
english
Access
Open access

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2025-01-23
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
—
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2025
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Works in OpenAlex

1066

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

6

i10-index

4

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy3
Open references deposited at Crossref
84%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
96%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification(no data)

No data available to the platform for this group

No platform data for: Classification — absence is not a judgment about the journal.

Subject areas

  • Polish Law and Legal System
  • Polish Law and Legal System
  • Polish Legal and Social Issues
  • Polish Legal and Social Issues
  • Local Governance and Planning
  • Local Governance and Planning
  • Polish Historical and Cultural Studies
  • Polish Historical and Cultural Studies
Show all subjects (50)
  • European and International Law Studies
  • European and International Law Studies
  • Intellectual Property Rights and Media
  • Intellectual Property Rights and Media
  • Theology and Canon Law Studies
  • Theology and Canon Law Studies
  • Agricultural economics and policies
  • Agricultural economics and policies
  • Language and Culture
  • Language and Culture
  • Classical Studies and Legal History
  • Classical Studies and Legal History
  • Economic and Fiscal Studies
  • European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
  • European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
  • Economic and Fiscal Studies
  • European and International Contract Law
  • European and International Contract Law
  • Ombudsman and Human Rights
  • Ombudsman and Human Rights
  • Law in Society and Culture
  • Law in Society and Culture
  • Polish socio-economic development
  • International Law and Human Rights
  • International Law and Human Rights
  • Polish socio-economic development
  • Historical and Cultural Studies of Poland
  • Criminal Law and Policy
  • Criminal Law and Policy
  • Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
  • Comparative and International Law Studies
  • Historical and Cultural Studies of Poland
  • Comparative and International Law Studies
  • Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
  • Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
  • EU Law and Policy Analysis
  • EU Law and Policy Analysis
  • Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
  • Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
  • Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
  • Judicial and Constitutional Studies
  • Judicial and Constitutional Studies

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • law
  • jurisprudence
  • public administration
  • legal studies

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: