Folia medica

Not yet evaluated

About the journal

Folia medica is a journal. It is listed in PUBMED according to the sources read. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

ISSN
0015-5608
Access
Not open access / not declared

Index listings

  • PUBMED · 1960-02-02
Indexing
PUBMED
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
—
Activity (OpenAlex)
Dormant — no works recorded since 2021
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Works in OpenAlex

35

Last recorded publication year

2024

Reported by OpenAlex in 0 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

3

i10-index

1

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy(no data)

No data available to the platform for this group

Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification(no data)

No data available to the platform for this group

No platform data for: Editorial & policy · Classification — absence is not a judgment about the journal.

Subject areas

  • Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Folate and B Vitamins Research
  • Neurological Complications and Syndromes

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: