الفكر الإسلامي المعاصر

International Institute of Islamic Thought

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

الفكر الإسلامي المعاصر is an open-access journal published by International Institute of Islamic Thought in United States, publishing in arabic. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 16 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
International Institute of Islamic Thought
ISSN
2707-515X · 2707-5168
Country
United States
Languages
arabic
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
964
Declared review time
16 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2020-03-27
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
16 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

964

Most recent article

5 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

16weeks

Works in OpenAlex

971

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

2

i10-index

0

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy10
Last DOAJ review date
2024-10-07
Added to DOAJ
2020-03-27
Declared plagiarism screening
Not declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
PKP PN
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
44%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
25%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity2
Alternate titles
Al-Fikr al-islāmī al-muʿāṣirAl-Fikr al-islāmī al-muʿāṣir.Contemporary islamic thought
Source type
journal
Classification4

Subjects (DOAJ)

EducationPhilosophy. Psychology. Religion: Religions. Mythology. Rationalism: Philosophy of religion. Psychology of religion. Religion in relation to other subjects

LCC codes

LBL51-65

Subject areas

  • Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies
  • Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies
  • Islamic Thought and Society Studies
  • Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
  • Military Technology and Strategies
  • Military Technology and Strategies
  • Legal and Regulatory Analysis
  • Legal and Regulatory Analysis
Show all subjects (75)
  • Islamic Studies and History
  • Islamic Studies and History
  • Islamic Studies and History
  • Education and Islamic Studies
  • Education and Islamic Studies
  • Education and Islamic Studies
  • Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
  • Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
  • Islamic Thought and Society Studies
  • Islamic Thought and Society Studies
  • Medieval and Classical Philosophy
  • Families in Therapy and Culture
  • Families in Therapy and Culture
  • Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
  • Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies
  • Education and Character Development
  • Historical and Linguistic Studies
  • Archaeology and Historical Studies
  • Archaeology and Historical Studies
  • Medical Research and Islamic Perspectives
  • Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
  • Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
  • Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
  • Philosophy, History, and Historiography
  • Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
  • Medical, Sociocultural, and Biopolitical Studies
  • Middle East Politics and Society
  • Socioeconomic Development in MENA
  • Medical, Sociocultural, and Biopolitical Studies
  • Socioeconomic Development in MENA
  • Philosophy and Historical Thought
  • Historical Economic and Legal Thought
  • Scientific Innovation and Industrial Efficiency
  • Scientific Innovation and Industrial Efficiency
  • Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
  • Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
  • International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
  • Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
  • Medieval History and Crusades
  • Diverse Philosophical and Cultural Studies
  • Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
  • Religious Freedom and Discrimination
  • Philosophical and Historical Studies
  • African Studies and Geopolitics
  • Architecture and Cultural Influences
  • African Studies and Geopolitics
  • Architecture and Cultural Influences
  • Medieval and Classical Philosophy
  • Medieval and Classical Philosophy
  • Media, Religion, Digital Communication
  • Media, Religion, Digital Communication
  • Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
  • Medieval History and Crusades
  • Global Maritime and Colonial Histories
  • African history and culture analysis
  • Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
  • African history and culture analysis
  • Global Maritime and Colonial Histories
  • Medieval History and Crusades
  • Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Marriage and Sexual Relationships

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • reform
  • consultation
  • reasoning
  • islam
  • intellectual effort

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: