Cuadernos de bioética/Cuadernos de bioética

Q106286904

Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Cuadernos de bioética/Cuadernos de bioética is a journal published by Q106286904. It is listed in MEDLINE according to the sources read. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Q106286904
ISSN
2386-3773 · 1132-1989
Access
Not open access / not declared

Index listings

  • MEDLINE · 2008-01-01
Indexing
MEDLINE
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
—
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Works in OpenAlex

972

Last recorded publication year

2024

Reported by OpenAlex in 0 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

9

i10-index

8

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy(no data)

No data available to the platform for this group

Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification(no data)

No data available to the platform for this group

No platform data for: Editorial & policy · Classification — absence is not a judgment about the journal.

Subject areas

  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Law, Ethics, and AI Impact
  • Law, Ethics, and AI Impact
  • Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Palliative and Oncologic Care
Show all subjects (50)
  • Bioethics and Human Rights Issues
  • Bioethics and Human Rights Issues
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
  • Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Social Sciences and Policies
  • Social Sciences and Policies
  • Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Psychological Treatments and Disorders
  • Psychological Treatments and Disorders
  • Health and Medical Education
  • Health and Medical Education
  • Child and Adolescent Health
  • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Child and Adolescent Health
  • Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Public Health in Brazil
  • Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Public Health in Brazil
  • Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Patient Dignity and Privacy
  • Patient Dignity and Privacy
  • Data Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Data Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
  • Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
  • Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Nursing care and research
  • Nursing care and research
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: