Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal

Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal is an open-access journal published by Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal in Brazil, publishing in ITALIAN and SPANISH and ENGLISH and PORTUGUESE. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 16 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal
ISSN
2359-3881 · 2525-510X
Country
Brazil
Languages
ITALIAN, SPANISH, ENGLISH, PORTUGUESE
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
368
Declared review time
16 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2025-06-26
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
16 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

368

Most recent article

5 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

16weeks

Works in OpenAlex

498

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

12

i10-index

20

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy11
Last DOAJ review date
2025-06-26
Added to DOAJ
2025-06-26
Declared plagiarism screening
Declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Declared digital preservation
PKP PNCariniana Network
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
PKP PN
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
0%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
73%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification2

Subjects (DOAJ)

Law

LCC codes

K

Subject areas

  • Criminal Law and Policy
  • Brazilian Legal Issues
  • Brazilian Legal Issues
  • Legal processes and jurisprudence
  • Brazilian Legal Issues
  • Criminal Law and Evidence
  • Legal processes and jurisprudence
  • Legal processes and jurisprudence
Show all subjects (75)
  • Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Education, Law, and Society
  • European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
  • European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
  • European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
  • Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
  • Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
  • Public Health in Brazil
  • Public Health in Brazil
  • Criminal Law and Evidence
  • Criminal Law and Evidence
  • Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
  • Jury Decision Making Processes
  • Jury Decision Making Processes
  • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Academic Research in Diverse Fields
  • Academic Research in Diverse Fields
  • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Judicial and Constitutional Studies
  • Law in Society and Culture
  • Law in Society and Culture
  • Judicial and Constitutional Studies
  • Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
  • Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
  • Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
  • Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
  • Artificial Intelligence in Law
  • Historical Legal Studies and Society
  • Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
  • Regulation and Compliance Studies
  • Regulation and Compliance Studies
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence in Law
  • International Law and Human Rights
  • International Law and Human Rights
  • European and International Law Studies
  • Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Legal Systems and Institutions
  • Artificial Intelligence in Law
  • Legal Systems and Institutions
  • International Law and Human Rights
  • Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Issues and Policies in Latin America
  • Social Issues and Policies in Latin America
  • Youth, Drugs, and Violence
  • Youth, Drugs, and Violence
  • Human Rights and Immigration
  • Human Rights and Immigration
  • Ombudsman and Human Rights
  • Publishing and Scholarly Communication
  • Criminal Law and Policy
  • Ombudsman and Human Rights
  • Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Criminal Law and Policy
  • Jury Decision Making Processes
  • Medieval and Early Modern Justice
  • Judicial and Constitutional Studies
  • Academic Writing and Publishing

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • criminal procedure
  • criminal law
  • law
  • criminal justice

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

No automated source read recorded