PLoS Clinical Trials

Public Library of Science

Not yet evaluated

About the journal

PLoS Clinical Trials is a journal published by Public Library of Science in United Kingdom. It is listed in PUBMED according to the sources read. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Public Library of Science
ISSN
1555-5887
Country
United Kingdom
Access
Not open access / not declared

Index listings

  • PUBMED · 2006-07-14
Indexing
PUBMED
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
—
Activity (OpenAlex)
Dormant — no works recorded since 2007
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Works in OpenAlex

71

Last recorded publication year

2010

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

32

i10-index

54

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy3
Norwegian register (HK-dir)— 2009
Level 1 — approved scholarly channel
Open references deposited at Crossref
0%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
0%
Identity & continuity2
Alternate titles
Public Library of Science clinical trialsPLoS Clin TrialsClinical trials
Source type
journal
Classification(no data)

No data available to the platform for this group

No platform data for: Classification — absence is not a judgment about the journal.

Subject areas

  • Malaria Research and Control
  • Malaria Research and Control
  • HIV Research and Treatment
  • HIV Research and Treatment
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Show all subjects (50)
  • Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
  • Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
  • Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
  • Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Trypanosoma species research and implications
  • vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Parasites and Host Interactions
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Trypanosoma species research and implications
  • HIV-related health complications and treatments
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
  • Folate and B Vitamins Research
  • Biological Research and Disease Studies
  • vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Parasites and Host Interactions
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • HIV-related health complications and treatments
  • Biological Research and Disease Studies
  • Folate and B Vitamins Research
  • Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
  • Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Reproductive tract infections research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Reproductive tract infections research
  • Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Estrogen and related hormone effects

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: