Análisis Filosófico

Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico (SADAF)

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Análisis Filosófico is an open-access journal published by Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico (SADAF) in Argentina, publishing in SPANISH and ENGLISH and PORTUGUESE. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 15 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico (SADAF)
ISSN
0326-1301 · 1851-9636
Country
Argentina
Languages
SPANISH, ENGLISH, PORTUGUESE
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
344
Declared review time
15 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2020-05-27
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
15 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

344

Most recent article

6 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

15weeks

Works in OpenAlex

395

Last recorded publication year

2026

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

8

i10-index

5

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy11
Last DOAJ review date
2023-11-17
Added to DOAJ
2020-05-27
Declared plagiarism screening
Not declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Declared digital preservation
CLOCKSS
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
CLOCKSSPKP PN
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
0%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
84%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification2

Subjects (DOAJ)

Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)

LCC codes

B1-5802

Subject areas

  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Show all subjects (75)
  • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
  • Philosophical Thought and Analysis
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Literary and Cultural Studies
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Literary and Cultural Studies
  • Legal and Social Philosophy
  • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Spanish Philosophy and Literature
  • History and Theory of Mathematics
  • Philosophical Thought and Analysis
  • Philosophical Thought and Analysis
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Legal processes and jurisprudence
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Legal processes and jurisprudence
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
  • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Philosophy and Historical Thought
  • Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
  • Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
  • Argentine historical studies
  • Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
  • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
  • Free Will and Agency
  • Free Will and Agency
  • Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Comparative International Legal Studies
  • Social Sciences and Policies
  • Psychological Treatments and Disorders
  • Psychological Treatments and Disorders
  • Social Sciences and Policies
  • Comparative International Legal Studies
  • Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Educational theories and practices
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Educational theories and practices
  • Economic and Social Development
  • Economic and Social Development
  • Spanish Philosophy and Literature
  • Spanish Philosophy and Literature
  • Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Political Theory and Democracy
  • Political Theory and Democracy
  • Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • philosophy
  • analytic philosophy
  • theoretical philosophy
  • practical philosophy
  • philosophy of science

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: