Transinformação

Pontificia Universidade Católica de Campinas

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Transinformação is an open-access journal published by Pontificia Universidade Católica de Campinas in Brazil, publishing in ENGLISH and PORTUGUESE and SPANISH. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 36 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Pontificia Universidade Católica de Campinas
ISSN
0103-3786 · 2318-0889
Country
Brazil
Languages
ENGLISH, PORTUGUESE, SPANISH
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
651
Declared review time
36 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2016-11-01
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
36 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

651

Most recent article

last month

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

36weeks

Works in OpenAlex

710

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 3 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

24

i10-index

90

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy10
Added to DOAJ
2016-11-01
Declared plagiarism screening
Declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Declared digital preservation
CLOCKSSCariniana Network
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
CLOCKSS
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
96%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
97%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification4

Subjects (DOAJ)

General Works: Museums. Collectors and collectingBibliography. Library science. Information resources

LCC codes

AM1-501Z

Subject areas

  • Information Science and Libraries
  • Information Science and Libraries
  • Information Science and Libraries
  • Library Science and Information
  • Business and Management Studies
  • Business and Management Studies
  • scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Education and Digital Technologies
Show all subjects (75)
  • Education and Digital Technologies
  • Science and Science Education
  • Science and Science Education
  • Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Library Science and Information Systems
  • Education and Public Policy
  • scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Education and Public Policy
  • scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Digital and Traditional Archives Management
  • Publishing and Scholarly Communication
  • Information Architecture and Usability
  • Information Architecture and Usability
  • Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Library Science and Administration
  • Web visibility and informetrics
  • Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence
  • Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Information Society and Technology Trends
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Web and Library Services
  • Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies
  • Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Communication and COVID-19 Impact
  • Communication and COVID-19 Impact
  • Academic Research in Diverse Fields
  • Academic Research in Diverse Fields
  • Information Architecture and Usability
  • Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Linguistics and Education Research
  • E-Government and Public Services
  • Linguistics and Education Research
  • Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry
  • Web visibility and informetrics
  • Web visibility and informetrics
  • E-Government and Public Services
  • Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Media and Digital Communication
  • E-Learning and Knowledge Management
  • E-Learning and Knowledge Management
  • Digital and Traditional Archives Management
  • Digital and Traditional Archives Management
  • Science, Technology, and Education in Latin America
  • Advertising and Communication Studies
  • Research Data Management Practices
  • Advertising and Communication Studies
  • Libraries and Information Services
  • linguistics and terminology studies
  • Research Data Management Practices
  • E-Government and Public Services
  • Research Data Management Practices
  • Media and Digital Communication
  • Media and Digital Communication
  • Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Education Pedagogy and Practices
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Education Pedagogy and Practices
  • Innovation and Knowledge Management

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • bibliometry
  • scientific production
  • information science
  • library science
  • archival science

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: