Claridades: Revista de Filosofía

FICUM

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Claridades: Revista de Filosofía is an open-access journal published by FICUM in Spain, publishing in spanish and italian and german and french. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 8 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
FICUM
ISSN
1889-6855 · 1989-3787
Country
Spain
Languages
spanish, italian, german, french
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
95
Declared review time
8 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2015-11-02
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
8 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

95

Most recent article

22 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

8weeks

Works in OpenAlex

297

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 2 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

5

i10-index

2

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy9
Last DOAJ review date
2021-03-02
Added to DOAJ
2015-11-02
Declared plagiarism screening
Not declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
76%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
67%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification2

Subjects (DOAJ)

Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)

LCC codes

B1-5802

Subject areas

  • Philosophical and Cultural Analysis
  • Philosophical and Cultural Analysis
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Philosophical Thought and Analysis
  • Philosophical Thought and Analysis
  • Philosophy and Historical Thought
  • Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
  • Spanish Philosophy and Literature
Show all subjects (75)
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Social Sciences and Policies
  • Social Sciences and Policies
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Philosophical Thought and Analysis
  • Philosophy and Phenomenology Studies
  • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
  • Philosophy and Phenomenology Studies
  • Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
  • Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
  • Religious and Theological Studies
  • Religious and Theological Studies
  • Marxism and Critical Theory
  • Spanish Philosophy and Literature
  • Spanish Philosophy and Literature
  • Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Philosophy, Health, and Society
  • Philosophy, Health, and Society
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
  • Education, Philosophy, and Society
  • Cybernetics and Technology in Society
  • Economic and Social Development
  • Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
  • Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis
  • Philosophical and Cultural Analysis
  • Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Economic and Social Development
  • Educational theories and practices
  • Law, Ethics, and AI Impact
  • Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism
  • Foucault, Power, and Ethics
  • Educational theories and practices
  • Law, Ethics, and AI Impact
  • Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Historical Philosophy and Science
  • Literary and Philosophical Studies
  • Cultural and Mythological Studies
  • Cultural and Mythological Studies
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Literary and Philosophical Studies
  • Medieval Philosophy and Theology
  • Psychological Treatments and Disorders
  • Philosophy and Historical Thought
  • Philosophy and Social Theory
  • Psychological Treatments and Disorders
  • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
  • Philosophy and Historical Thought
  • Critical Theory and Philosophy
  • Philosophy and Social Theory
  • Political Economy and Marxism
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Education Methods and Integration
  • Philosophy and Education Pedagogy
  • Philosophy and Education Pedagogy
  • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
  • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
  • Education and Teacher Training
  • Education and Teacher Training
  • Education Methods and Integration

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • philosophy

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: