DoisPontos

Universidade Federal do Paraná

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

DoisPontos is an open-access journal published by Universidade Federal do Paraná in Brazil, publishing in PORTUGUESE. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 12 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Universidade Federal do Paraná
ISSN
1807-3883 · 2179-7412
Country
Brazil
Languages
PORTUGUESE
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
188
Declared review time
12 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2021-02-19
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
12 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

188

Most recent article

11 years ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

12weeks

Works in OpenAlex

790

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

8

i10-index

6

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy12
Last DOAJ review date
2021-02-19
Added to DOAJ
2021-02-19
Declared plagiarism screening
Declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Declared digital preservation
Cariniana Network
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
PKP PN
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Norwegian register (HK-dir)— 2026
Level 1 — approved scholarly channel
Open references deposited at Crossref
15%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
66%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity2
Alternate titles
Dois Pontos
Source type
journal
Classification2

Subjects (DOAJ)

Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)

LCC codes

B1-5802

Subject areas

  • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
  • Psychology and Mental Health
  • Psychology and Mental Health
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Medieval Philosophy and Theology
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis
  • Philosophy and Historical Thought
Show all subjects (75)
  • Philosophy and Historical Thought
  • Marxism and Critical Theory
  • Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
  • Philosophy and Historical Thought
  • Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
  • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
  • Critical Theory and Philosophy
  • Philosophical Thought and Analysis
  • Philosophical Thought and Analysis
  • Brazilian Legal Issues
  • Social and Economic Solidarity
  • Social and Economic Solidarity
  • Brazilian Legal Issues
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Social and Political Issues
  • Social and Political Issues
  • Political Theology and Sovereignty
  • Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis
  • Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Historical Philosophy and Science
  • Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Gender, Sexuality, and Education
  • Gender, Sexuality, and Education
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Foucault, Power, and Ethics
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Philosophy and Phenomenology Studies
  • Critical Theory and Philosophy
  • Critical Theory and Philosophy
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Literature, Culture, and Criticism
  • Literature, Culture, and Criticism
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
  • Brazilian cultural history and politics
  • Brazilian cultural history and politics
  • Political Theory and Democracy
  • Philosophy and Social Theory
  • Medieval and Classical Philosophy
  • Simone de Beauvoir and Sartre
  • Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
  • Brazilian Legal Issues
  • Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
  • Medieval Philosophy and Theology
  • Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
  • Medieval Philosophy and Theology
  • Political Theology and Sovereignty
  • Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
  • Political Theology and Sovereignty
  • Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
  • Historical Philosophy and Science
  • Marxism and Critical Theory
  • Marxism and Critical Theory
  • Historical Philosophy and Science
  • Historical and Literary Studies
  • Historical and Literary Studies
  • Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Political Economy and Marxism
  • Political Economy and Marxism

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • philosophy

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: