Tábano

Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Tábano is an open-access journal published by Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina in Argentina, publishing in spanish and english. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 36 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina
ISSN
1852-7221 · 2591-572X
Country
Argentina
Languages
spanish, english
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
401
Declared review time
36 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2020-05-20
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
36 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

401

Most recent article

3 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

36weeks

Works in OpenAlex

111

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

2

i10-index

1

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy9
Last DOAJ review date
2021-06-30
Added to DOAJ
2020-05-20
Declared plagiarism screening
Declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
35%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
13%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification4

Subjects (DOAJ)

General Works: History of scholarship and learning. The humanitiesPhilosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)

LCC codes

AZ20-999B1-5802

Subject areas

  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Philosophical and Cultural Analysis
  • Philosophical and Cultural Analysis
  • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
  • Philosophy and Phenomenology Studies
  • Philosophy and Phenomenology Studies
  • Philosophical Thought and Analysis
  • Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis
Show all subjects (75)
  • Philosophical Thought and Analysis
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Philosophy and Historical Thought
  • Philosophy and Phenomenology Studies
  • Religious and Theological Studies
  • Religious and Theological Studies
  • Philosophy and Literary Analysis
  • Psychological Treatments and Disorders
  • Psychological Treatments and Disorders
  • Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
  • Cybernetics and Technology in Society
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • University Challenges and Reforms
  • Critical Theory and Political Philosophy
  • Cultural and Social Dynamics
  • Philosophy, Health, and Society
  • Philosophy, Health, and Society
  • Literature, Culture, and Aesthetics
  • Marxism and Critical Theory
  • Philosophy and Education Pedagogy
  • Visual Culture and Art Theory
  • Art, Aesthetics, and Perception
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Cultural and Social Dynamics
  • Literature, Culture, and Aesthetics
  • Cultural and Mythological Studies
  • Marxism and Critical Theory
  • Cultural and Mythological Studies
  • Cinema History and Criticism
  • Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
  • Social Sciences and Policies
  • Literary and Cultural Studies
  • Philosophy and Education Pedagogy
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Marxism and Critical Theory
  • Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Cinema History and Criticism
  • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
  • Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Spanish Philosophy and Literature
  • Interdisciplinary Studies: Technology, Society, and Humanities
  • Classical Studies and Philology
  • Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
  • Psychoanalysis and Social Critique
  • Literary and Cultural Studies
  • Social Sciences and Policies
  • Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Latin American Literature Analysis
  • Spanish Philosophy and Literature
  • Literacy and Educational Practices
  • Latin American Cultural Politics
  • Latin American Cultural Politics
  • Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Literacy and Educational Practices
  • Latin American Literature Analysis
  • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
  • Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism
  • Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Spanish Philosophy and Literature
  • Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism
  • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
  • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • philosophy
  • humanities
  • aesthetics
  • ethics
  • epistemology
  • metaphysics

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: