Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi

Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi is an open-access journal, publishing in turkish and english. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

ISSN
2147-768X
Languages
turkish, english
Access
Open access

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2024-06-15
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
—
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2025
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Works in OpenAlex

152

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

5

i10-index

1

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy2
Open references deposited at Crossref
100%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
100%
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification(no data)

No data available to the platform for this group

No platform data for: Classification — absence is not a judgment about the journal.

Subject areas

  • Legal Issues in Turkey
  • Legal Issues in Turkey
  • Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
  • Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
  • Public Administration and Governance
  • Public Administration and Governance
  • Ombudsman and Human Rights
  • Ombudsman and Human Rights
Show all subjects (50)
  • Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
  • Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
  • Law, logistics, and international trade
  • Turkish Urban and Social Issues
  • International Law and Human Rights
  • Turkish Urban and Social Issues
  • International Law and Human Rights
  • Law, logistics, and international trade
  • Ottoman and Turkish Studies
  • European and International Contract Law
  • European and International Contract Law
  • Ottoman and Turkish Studies
  • Judicial and Constitutional Studies
  • Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
  • Families in Therapy and Culture
  • Judicial and Constitutional Studies
  • European and International Law Studies
  • Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
  • Families in Therapy and Culture
  • European and International Law Studies
  • Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
  • Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
  • Gender Studies and Social Issues
  • Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Gender Studies and Social Issues
  • Global Peace and Security Dynamics
  • Historical Turkish Studies
  • Global Peace and Security Dynamics
  • Criminal Law and Policy
  • Criminal Law and Policy
  • Historical Turkish Studies
  • Corporate Law and Human Rights
  • Ottoman Empire History and Society
  • Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Corporate Law and Human Rights
  • Ottoman Empire History and Society
  • Turkish Literature and Culture
  • Turkish Literature and Culture
  • Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Digital Games and Media
  • Digital Games and Media

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • law
  • public law
  • private law
  • it law
  • international law
  • comparative law

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: