Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica

Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Journal websitePeer review: Other
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica is an open-access journal published by Universidad Pontificia Comillas in Spain, publishing in spanish. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 52 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Universidad Pontificia Comillas
ISSN
0031-4749 · 2386-5822
Country
Spain
Languages
spanish
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
1670
Declared review time
52 weeks
Declared peer-review model
other

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2017-06-30
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
52 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

1670

Most recent article

2 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

52weeks

Works in OpenAlex

2121

Last recorded publication year

2026

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

10

i10-index

11

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy10
Last DOAJ review date
2022-02-04
Added to DOAJ
2017-06-30
Declared plagiarism screening
Not declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Norwegian register (HK-dir)— 2026
Level 1 — approved scholarly channel
Open references deposited at Crossref
66%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
36%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification3

Subjects (DOAJ)

Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)

LCC codes

BB1-5802

Subject areas

  • Philosophical Thought and Analysis
  • Philosophical Thought and Analysis
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Philosophy and Historical Thought
  • Medieval Philosophy and Theology
  • Philosophical and Cultural Analysis
  • Religious and Theological Studies
  • Religious and Theological Studies
Show all subjects (75)
  • Philosophical and Cultural Analysis
  • Spanish Philosophy and Literature
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Spanish Philosophy and Literature
  • Spanish Philosophy and Literature
  • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
  • Philosophy and Phenomenology Studies
  • Philosophy and Phenomenology Studies
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Literary and Cultural Studies
  • Literary and Cultural Studies
  • Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
  • Religious and Theological Studies
  • Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis
  • Medieval and Classical Philosophy
  • Philosophical Thought and Analysis
  • Marxism and Critical Theory
  • Historical Philosophy and Science
  • Philosophy, Health, and Society
  • Law, Ethics, and AI Impact
  • Medieval Philosophy and Theology
  • Medieval Philosophy and Theology
  • Law, Ethics, and AI Impact
  • Philosophy, Health, and Society
  • Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
  • Psychological Treatments and Disorders
  • Psychological Treatments and Disorders
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences and Policies
  • Social Sciences and Policies
  • Critical Theory and Philosophy
  • Cultural and Mythological Studies
  • Cultural and Mythological Studies
  • Educational theories and practices
  • Educational theories and practices
  • Karl Barth and Christian Theology
  • Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
  • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
  • Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
  • Historical Studies in Latin America
  • Economic and Social Development
  • Historical Studies in Latin America
  • Economic and Social Development
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism
  • Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Historical Studies in Science
  • Historical Studies in Science
  • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
  • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Augustinian Studies and Theology
  • Augustinian Studies and Theology

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • philosophy
  • religion
  • ethics
  • aesthetics
  • epistemology

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: