Perspectives in Clinical Research

Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications

Journal websitePeer review: Other
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Perspectives in Clinical Research is an open-access journal published by Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications in India, publishing in english. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 26 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
ISSN
2229-3485 · 2229-5488
Country
India
Languages
english
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
692
Declared review time
26 weeks
Declared peer-review model
other

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2015-11-18
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
26 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

692

Most recent article

2 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

26weeks

Works in OpenAlex

760

Last recorded publication year

2026

Reported by OpenAlex in 2 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

64

i10-index

283

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy11
Last DOAJ review date
2024-08-08
Added to DOAJ
2015-11-18
Declared plagiarism screening
Declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Declared digital preservation
CLOCKSSLOCKSSPorticoPMC
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
CLOCKSSPortico
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
100%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
0%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity2
Source type
journal
NLM unique ID (PubMed)
101551517
Classification3

Subjects (DOAJ)

Medicine: Medicine (General)

LCC codes

RR5-920

Subject areas

  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Show all subjects (75)
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Healthcare Regulation
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
  • Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Research Data Management Practices
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Biotechnology and Related Fields
  • Biotechnology and Related Fields
  • Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
  • Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
  • Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
  • Patient Safety and Medication Errors

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • medicine
  • research methodology

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: