Field Methods

SAGE Publishing

Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Field Methods is a journal published by SAGE Publishing in United States. It is listed in PUBMED according to the sources read. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
SAGE Publishing
ISSN
1552-3969 · 1525-822X
Country
United States
Access
Not open access / not declared
Official website
http://fmx.sagepub.com/

Index listings

  • PUBMED · 2010-08-01
Indexing
PUBMED
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
—
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Works in OpenAlex

701

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

79

i10-index

382

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy5
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
CLOCKSSPortico
Norwegian register (HK-dir)— 2026
Level 1 — approved scholarly channel
Open references deposited at Crossref
100%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
95%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Identity & continuity2
Source type
journal
NLM unique ID (PubMed)
100962988
Classification(no data)

No data available to the platform for this group

No platform data for: Classification — absence is not a judgment about the journal.

Subject areas

  • Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
  • Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
  • Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
Show all subjects (50)
  • Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
  • Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
  • Community Health and Development
  • Community Health and Development
  • Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
  • Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
  • Participatory Visual Research Methods
  • Participatory Visual Research Methods
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
  • Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Capital and Networks
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Social Capital and Networks
  • Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
  • Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Healthcare Policy and Management

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: