Informal Logic

University of Windsor

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Informal Logic is an open-access journal published by University of Windsor in Canada, publishing in english. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 12 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
University of Windsor
ISSN
0824-2577 · 2293-734X
Country
Canada
Languages
english
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
1299
Declared review time
12 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2008-05-27
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
12 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

1299

Most recent article

4 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

12weeks

Works in OpenAlex

1010

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 2 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

46

i10-index

287

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy12
Last DOAJ review date
2025-12-19
Added to DOAJ
2008-05-27
Declared plagiarism screening
Not declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Declared digital preservation
PorticoScholars Portal
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
Portico
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Norwegian register (HK-dir)— 2026
Level 1 — approved scholarly channel
Open references deposited at Crossref
0%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
76%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity2
Alternate titles
Reasoning and argumentation in theory and practice
Source type
journal
Classification2

Subjects (DOAJ)

Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Logic

LCC codes

BC1-199

Subject areas

  • Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Rhetoric and Communication Studies
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Show all subjects (75)
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
  • Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
  • Rhetoric and Communication Studies
  • Rhetoric and Communication Studies
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Education, Philosophy, and Society
  • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
  • Legal processes and jurisprudence
  • Philosophical Thought and Analysis
  • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Free Will and Agency
  • Free Will and Agency
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
  • Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
  • Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
  • Law in Society and Culture
  • Law in Society and Culture
  • Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Biographical and Historical Analysis
  • Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • reasoning
  • argumentation
  • informal logic

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: