Kritisk Juss

Scandinavian University Press

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Kritisk Juss is an open-access journal published by Scandinavian University Press in Norway, publishing in NORWEGIAN NYNORSK and NORWEGIAN BOKMÅL. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 20 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Scandinavian University Press
ISSN
0804-7375 · 2387-4546
Country
Norway
Languages
NORWEGIAN NYNORSK, NORWEGIAN BOKMÅL
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
126
Declared review time
20 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2017-07-26
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
20 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

126

Most recent article

last month

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

20weeks

Works in OpenAlex

507

Last recorded publication year

2026

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

5

i10-index

2

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy12
Last DOAJ review date
2026-03-17
Added to DOAJ
2017-07-26
Declared plagiarism screening
Not declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Declared digital preservation
Portico
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
Portico
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Norwegian register (HK-dir)— 2026
Level 1 — approved scholarly channel
Open references deposited at Crossref
0%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
0%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification2

Subjects (DOAJ)

Law: Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence

LCC codes

K1-7720

Subject areas

  • European and International Law Studies
  • European and International Law Studies
  • Criminal Law and Policy
  • Legal Rights and Human Rights
  • Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research
  • Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research
  • Criminal Justice and Penology
  • European and International Law Studies
Show all subjects (75)
  • Legal processes and jurisprudence
  • Discrimination and Equality Law
  • Administrative Law and Governance
  • Judicial and Constitutional Studies
  • Legal Education and Practice Innovations
  • Legal and Social Justice Studies
  • International Law and Human Rights
  • Immigration Law and Human Rights
  • Law, Rights, and Freedoms
  • Social and Educational Sciences
  • Social and Educational Sciences
  • Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
  • Research in Social Sciences
  • Family and Matrimonial Law
  • Research in Social Sciences
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Criminal Law and Evidence
  • Labor Law and Work Dynamics
  • Ombudsman and Human Rights
  • Historical Legal Studies and Society
  • Health, Medicine and Society
  • Legal principles and applications
  • European Law and Migration
  • Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
  • Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
  • Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • International Law and Human Rights
  • International Law and Human Rights
  • Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
  • Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
  • Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Migration and Labor Dynamics
  • Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Migration and Labor Dynamics
  • Criminal Law and Evidence
  • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Child and Adolescent Health
  • Child and Adolescent Health
  • Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
  • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Criminal Law and Evidence
  • Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
  • Sex work and related issues
  • Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Sex work and related issues
  • Law in Society and Culture
  • Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
  • Law in Society and Culture
  • Jury Decision Making Processes
  • Jury Decision Making Processes
  • Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
  • International Arbitration and Investment Law
  • Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Freedom of Expression and Defamation
  • Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • International Arbitration and Investment Law
  • Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Torture, Ethics, and Law
  • Freedom of Expression and Defamation
  • Torture, Ethics, and Law

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • law
  • critical law
  • politics of law

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: