Research Synthesis Methods

Wiley

Journal websitePeer review: Peer review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Research Synthesis Methods is a journal published by Wiley in United Kingdom. It is listed in MEDLINE according to the sources read. Declared publication charge: 3,400 USD. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Wiley
ISSN
1759-2879 · 1759-2887
Country
United Kingdom
Access
Not open access / not declared
Declared publication charge
3,400 USD
Declared peer-review model
peer_review

Index listings

  • MEDLINE · 2015-01-01
Indexing
MEDLINE
APC
3,400 USD
Declared review time (DOAJ)
—
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Works in OpenAlex

985

Last recorded publication year

2026

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

108

i10-index

511

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy5
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
CLOCKSSPortico
Norwegian register (HK-dir)— 2026
Level 1 — approved scholarly channel
Open references deposited at Crossref
92%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
76%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Identity & continuity3
Source type
journal
NLM unique ID (PubMed)
101543738
Classification(no data)

No data available to the platform for this group

No platform data for: Classification — absence is not a judgment about the journal.

Subject areas

  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Delphi Technique in Research
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Show all subjects (75)
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
  • Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
  • Human auditory perception and evaluation
  • Human auditory perception and evaluation
  • Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Delphi Technique in Research
  • Delphi Technique in Research
  • Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Educational Robotics and Engineering
  • Educational Robotics and Engineering
  • Data Analysis with R
  • Data Analysis with R
  • Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
  • Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Research Data Management Practices
  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Topic Modeling
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Health Sciences Research and Education

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: