inTRAlinea: Online Translation Journal

University of Bologna

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in
Follow this journal
PrintDownload PDF

About the journal

inTRAlinea: Online Translation Journal is an open-access journal published by University of Bologna in Italy, publishing in english and french and german and italian. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 12 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
University of Bologna
ISSN
1827-000X
Country
Italy
Languages
english, french, german, italian
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
0
Declared review time
12 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind
Official website
http://www.intralinea.org

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2009-03-18
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
12 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
No yearly counts available
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

0

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

12weeks

Editorial & policy7
Last DOAJ review date
2020-08-13
Added to DOAJ
2009-03-18
Declared plagiarism screening
Not declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Norwegian register (HK-dir)— 2026
Level 1 — approved scholarly channel
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity(no data)

No data available to the platform for this group

Classification2

Subjects (DOAJ)

Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics: Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar: Translating and interpreting

LCC codes

P306-310

No platform data for: Multi-source verification · Impact metrics · Identity & continuity — absence is not a judgment about the journal.

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • translation studies
  • languages
  • cultures
  • translating and interpreting
  • intercultural studies

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: