Quién

Asociación Española de Personalismo

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Quién is an open-access journal published by Asociación Española de Personalismo in Spain, publishing in spanish and english. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 24 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Asociación Española de Personalismo
ISSN
2443-972X
Country
Spain
Languages
spanish, english
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
0
Declared review time
24 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2023-01-02
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
24 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2025
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

0

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

24weeks

Works in OpenAlex

242

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

3

i10-index

0

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy10
Last DOAJ review date
2023-01-02
Added to DOAJ
2023-01-02
Declared plagiarism screening
Not declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
PKP PN
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
17%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
8%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity2
Alternate titles
Quién (Madrid
Source type
journal
Classification6

Subjects (DOAJ)

Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: EthicsEducation: Education (General)

LCC codes

B1-5802BJ1-1725L7-991

Subject areas

  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Philosophy and Historical Thought
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Spanish Philosophy and Literature
  • Religious and Theological Studies
  • Religious and Theological Studies
Show all subjects (75)
  • Catholicism and Religious Studies
  • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
  • Religious and Theological Studies
  • Social Sciences and Policies
  • Social Sciences and Policies
  • Philosophy and Phenomenology Studies
  • Education, Philosophy, and Society
  • Philosophy and Phenomenology Studies
  • Philosophical Thought and Analysis
  • Philosophical Thought and Analysis
  • Philosophy and Phenomenology Studies
  • Philosophy, Health, and Society
  • Philosophy, Health, and Society
  • Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
  • Spanish Philosophy and Literature
  • Psychological Treatments and Disorders
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Spanish Philosophy and Literature
  • Psychological Treatments and Disorders
  • Philosophical and Cultural Analysis
  • Philosophical and Cultural Analysis
  • Cinema History and Criticism
  • Theology and Canon Law Studies
  • Law, Ethics, and AI Impact
  • Theology and Canon Law Studies
  • Law, Ethics, and AI Impact
  • Karl Barth and Christian Theology
  • Reformed Theology and Governance
  • Philosophy and Education Pedagogy
  • Philosophy and Education Pedagogy
  • Education and Cultural Studies
  • Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory
  • Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Education and Cultural Studies
  • Cinema History and Criticism
  • Catholicism, Bioethics, Media, Education
  • Cinema History and Criticism
  • Values and Moral Education
  • Catholicism, Bioethics, Media, Education
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Educational theories and practices
  • Educational theories and practices
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Education and Teacher Training
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Medieval Philosophy and Theology
  • Spanish Literature and Culture Studies
  • Education and Teacher Training
  • Catholicism, Bioethics, Media, Education
  • Society, Economy, and Ethics Research
  • Cultural and Social Dynamics
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social and Cultural Studies
  • Cultural and Social Dynamics
  • Philosophical and Historical Studies
  • Language and Culture
  • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Medieval Philosophy and Theology
  • Spanish Culture and Identity
  • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Language and Culture
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Spanish Culture and Identity
  • Medieval Philosophy and Theology

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • personalism
  • anthropology
  • contemporary philosophy
  • ethics
  • interpersonal relationships

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: