Práticas da História

Universidade Nova de Lisboa

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Práticas da História is an open-access journal published by Universidade Nova de Lisboa in Portugal, publishing in ENGLISH and PORTUGUESE. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 28 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Universidade Nova de Lisboa
ISSN
2183-590X
Country
Portugal
Languages
ENGLISH, PORTUGUESE
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
390
Declared review time
28 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2019-04-29
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
28 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
No yearly counts available
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

390

Most recent article

19 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

28weeks

Editorial & policy7
Last DOAJ review date
2024-04-20
Added to DOAJ
2019-04-29
Declared plagiarism screening
Declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
PKP PN
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity(no data)

No data available to the platform for this group

Classification3

Subjects (DOAJ)

History (General) and history of Europe: History (General)

LCC codes

DD1-2009

No platform data for: Multi-source verification · Impact metrics · Identity & continuity — absence is not a judgment about the journal.

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • historiography
  • theory of history
  • uses of the past

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: