Acta Musei Porolissensis

Editura Mega

Journal websitePeer review: Peer review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Acta Musei Porolissensis is an open-access journal published by Editura Mega in Romania, publishing in english and romanian and german and french. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 8 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Editura Mega
ISSN
1016-2801
Country
Romania
Languages
english, romanian, german, french
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
0
Declared review time
8 weeks
Declared peer-review model
peer_review

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2021-03-08
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
8 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
No yearly counts available
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

0

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

8weeks

Editorial & policy6
Last DOAJ review date
2022-09-26
Added to DOAJ
2021-03-08
Declared plagiarism screening
Declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity(no data)

No data available to the platform for this group

Classification2

Subjects (DOAJ)

Auxiliary sciences of history: Archaeology

LCC codes

CC1-960

No platform data for: Multi-source verification · Impact metrics · Identity & continuity — absence is not a judgment about the journal.

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • roman archaeology
  • prehistory
  • ethnology
  • la tene archaeology
  • restauration
  • conservation

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: