Jurnal Studi Agama

Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Pemikiran Islam, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Jurnal Studi Agama is an open-access journal published by Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Pemikiran Islam, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang in Indonesia, publishing in ENGLISH and INDONESIAN. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 8 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Pemikiran Islam, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang
ISSN
2655-9439
Country
Indonesia
Languages
ENGLISH, INDONESIAN
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
103
Declared review time
8 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2024-02-17
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
8 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2025
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

103

Most recent article

10 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

8weeks

Works in OpenAlex

98

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

6

i10-index

1

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy10
Last DOAJ review date
2024-02-17
Added to DOAJ
2024-02-17
Declared plagiarism screening
Declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Declared digital preservation
LOCKSS
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
21%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
13%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification2

Subjects (DOAJ)

Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Religions. Mythology. Rationalism: Religion (General)

LCC codes

BL1-50

Subject areas

  • Islamic Studies and Radicalism
  • Islamic Studies and Radicalism
  • Cultural and Religious Practices in Indonesia
  • Islamic Thought and Society Studies
  • Cultural and Religious Practices in Indonesia
  • Cultural and Religious Practices in Indonesia
  • Islamic Studies and Radicalism
  • Education and Character Development
Show all subjects (75)
  • Education and Character Development
  • Islamic Finance and Communication
  • Islamic Finance and Communication
  • Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
  • Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Contemporary Christian Leadership and Education
  • Contemporary Christian Leadership and Education
  • Education and Islamic Studies
  • Pancasila Values in Education
  • Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
  • Pancasila Values in Education
  • Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
  • Contemporary Christian Leadership and Education
  • Diverse Philosophical and Cultural Studies
  • Religion and Society Interactions
  • Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies
  • Education and Islamic Studies
  • Education and Islamic Studies
  • Media, Religion, Digital Communication
  • Education and Character Development
  • Asian Studies and History
  • Asian Studies and History
  • Cultural and Artistic Studies
  • Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Cultural and Artistic Studies
  • Catholicism and Religious Studies
  • Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation
  • Legal Studies and Policies
  • Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation
  • Legal Studies and Policies
  • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
  • Religious and Theological Studies
  • Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Educational Methods and Impacts
  • Historical and Linguistic Studies
  • Religious, Philosophical, and Educational Studies
  • Educational Methods and Impacts
  • Multicultural Education and Local Wisdom
  • Multicultural Education and Local Wisdom
  • Christian Theology and Mission
  • Christian Theology and Mission
  • Religious Education and Schools
  • Gender and Women's Rights
  • Mental Health and Well-being
  • Semiotics and Representation Studies
  • Cultural and Sociopolitical Studies
  • Waste Management and Recycling
  • Mental Health and Well-being
  • Gender and Women's Rights
  • Religious Education and Schools
  • Islamic Finance and Communication
  • Asian Studies and History
  • Legal and Social Justice Studies
  • Catholicism and Religious Studies
  • Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Waste Management and Recycling
  • Media, Religion, Digital Communication
  • Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Media, Religion, Digital Communication
  • Catholicism and Religious Studies
  • Legal and Social Justice Studies
  • Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
  • Educational Research and Methods
  • Waste Management and Recycling
  • Educational Research and Methods
  • Religion, Ecology, and Ethics

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • journal of religious studies
  • religious
  • spiritual traditions
  • philosophy of religion
  • history of religions
  • sociology of religion

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: