Belas Infiéis

Universidade de Brasília

Journal websitePeer review: Other
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Belas Infiéis is an open-access journal published by Universidade de Brasília in Brazil, publishing in ENGLISH and FRENCH and PORTUGUESE and SPANISH. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 24 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Universidade de Brasília
ISSN
2316-6614
Country
Brazil
Languages
ENGLISH, FRENCH, PORTUGUESE, SPANISH
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
423
Declared review time
24 weeks
Declared peer-review model
other

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2017-01-04
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
24 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

423

Most recent article

6 years ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

24weeks

Works in OpenAlex

640

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

7

i10-index

5

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy10
Last DOAJ review date
2020-02-03
Added to DOAJ
2017-01-04
Declared plagiarism screening
Declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Declared digital preservation
LOCKSS
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
95%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
95%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification3

Subjects (DOAJ)

Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics: Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar: Translating and interpreting

LCC codes

PP306-310

Subject areas

  • Translation Studies and Practices
  • Translation Studies and Practices
  • Translation Studies and Practices
  • Comparative and World Literature
  • Linguistics and Education Research
  • Linguistics and Education Research
  • Literature, Culture, and Criticism
  • Literature, Culture, and Criticism
Show all subjects (75)
  • Literature, Culture, and Criticism
  • Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies
  • Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies
  • Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
  • linguistics and terminology studies
  • linguistics and terminology studies
  • Linguistics and Language Studies
  • Linguistics and Language Studies
  • Latin American Literature Analysis
  • Hearing Impairment and Communication
  • Classical Studies and Philology
  • Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
  • Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
  • Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
  • Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
  • Language and Culture
  • Poetry Analysis and Criticism
  • EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
  • French Literature and Criticism
  • Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
  • Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
  • Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
  • Hearing Impairment and Communication
  • Hearing Impairment and Communication
  • French Literature and Poetry
  • Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
  • Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Themes in Literature Analysis
  • Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Cultural and Social Studies in Latin America
  • Gender and Feminist Studies
  • French Literature and Critical Theory
  • Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • linguistics and terminology studies
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Linguistic research and analysis
  • Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition
  • Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition
  • Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
  • Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
  • Literary and Philosophical Studies
  • Literary and Philosophical Studies
  • Literature, Culture, and Aesthetics
  • Literature, Culture, and Aesthetics
  • Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
  • French Literature and Poetry
  • Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
  • Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
  • Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
  • French Literature and Poetry
  • Education and Digital Technologies
  • Education and Digital Technologies
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Urban and sociocultural dynamics
  • Social and Cultural Studies
  • Brazilian cultural history and politics
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Urban and sociocultural dynamics
  • Social and Cultural Studies
  • Brazilian cultural history and politics

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • translation studies
  • terminology
  • history and theory of translation
  • interpretation
  • literature
  • linguistics

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: