Revista de Estudios Kantianos

Sociedad de Estudios Kantianos en Lengua Española (SEKLE)

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Revista de Estudios Kantianos is an open-access journal published by Sociedad de Estudios Kantianos en Lengua Española (SEKLE) in Spain, publishing in italian and french and spanish and english. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 40 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Sociedad de Estudios Kantianos en Lengua Española (SEKLE)
ISSN
2445-0669
Country
Spain
Languages
italian, french, spanish, english
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
243
Declared review time
40 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2023-01-19
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
40 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

243

Most recent article

3 years ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

40weeks

Works in OpenAlex

309

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

5

i10-index

1

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy9
Last DOAJ review date
2023-01-19
Added to DOAJ
2023-01-19
Declared plagiarism screening
Declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
0%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
56%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification2

Subjects (DOAJ)

Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)

LCC codes

B1-5802

Subject areas

  • Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
  • Philosophical Thought and Analysis
  • Philosophical Thought and Analysis
  • Philosophy and Historical Thought
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Show all subjects (75)
  • Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
  • Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Critical Theory and Philosophy
  • Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
  • Literary and Cultural Studies
  • Literary and Cultural Studies
  • War, Ethics, and Justification
  • War, Ethics, and Justification
  • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Philosophical and Cultural Analysis
  • Philosophy and Historical Thought
  • Philosophical and Cultural Analysis
  • Philosophy and Historical Thought
  • Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
  • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
  • Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought
  • Spanish Philosophy and Literature
  • Historical Philosophy and Science
  • Historical Philosophy and Science
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Advertising and Communication Studies
  • Advertising and Communication Studies
  • Political Theology and Sovereignty
  • Political Theology and Sovereignty
  • Religious and Theological Studies
  • Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
  • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
  • Religious and Theological Studies
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Free Will and Agency
  • Philosophy and Phenomenology Studies
  • Journalism and Media Studies
  • Economic and Social Development
  • Legal Rights and Human Rights
  • Free Will and Agency
  • Philosophy and Phenomenology Studies
  • Journalism and Media Studies
  • Economic and Social Development
  • Law, Ethics, and AI Impact
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Psychoanalysis and Social Critique
  • Comparative International Legal Studies
  • Psychoanalysis and Social Critique
  • Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
  • Comparative International Legal Studies
  • Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
  • Law, Ethics, and AI Impact
  • Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
  • Philosophy, History, and Historiography
  • Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Biographical and Historical Analysis
  • Critical Theory and Political Philosophy
  • Karl Barth and Christian Theology
  • Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
  • Historical Philosophy and Science
  • History and Theory of Mathematics

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • kant
  • philosophy
  • german idealism
  • history of philosophy

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: