Open Library of Humanities

Open Library of Humanities

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Open Library of Humanities is an open-access journal published by Open Library of Humanities in United Kingdom, publishing in spanish and english. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 15 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Open Library of Humanities
ISSN
2056-6700
Country
United Kingdom
Languages
spanish, english
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
416
Declared review time
15 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2017-01-04
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
15 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

416

Most recent article

2 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

15weeks

Works in OpenAlex

453

Last recorded publication year

2026

Reported by OpenAlex in 2 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

20

i10-index

41

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy12
Last DOAJ review date
2025-12-18
Added to DOAJ
2017-01-04
Declared plagiarism screening
Declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Declared digital preservation
CLOCKSSLOCKSS
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
CLOCKSSPortico
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Norwegian register (HK-dir)— 2026
Level 1 — approved scholarly channel
Open references deposited at Crossref
67%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
48%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification2

Subjects (DOAJ)

General Works: History of scholarship and learning. The humanities

LCC codes

AZ20-999

Subject areas

  • Medieval Literature and History
  • Intellectual Property Law
  • Intellectual Property Law
  • Contemporary Literature and Criticism
  • Modernist Literature and Criticism
  • Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
  • Digital Humanities and Scholarship
  • Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Show all subjects (75)
  • Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies
  • Art, Politics, and Modernism
  • Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
  • Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
  • Medieval Literature and History
  • Cinema History and Criticism
  • Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
  • Medieval Literature and History
  • Library Science and Information Systems
  • Library Science and Information Systems
  • Visual Culture and Art Theory
  • Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Cinema and Media Studies
  • Cinema and Media Studies
  • Theatre and Performance Studies
  • Digital Games and Media
  • Digital Games and Media
  • Irish and British Studies
  • Digital Games and Media
  • Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
  • Contemporary Literature and Criticism
  • Contemporary Literature and Criticism
  • Irish and British Studies
  • Medieval and Early Modern Justice
  • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
  • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
  • Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
  • Art, Technology, and Culture
  • American and British Literature Analysis
  • Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
  • Irish and British Studies
  • Digital and Traditional Archives Management
  • Geographies of human-animal interactions
  • Musicology and Musical Analysis
  • Gothic Literature and Media Analysis
  • Digital Humanities and Scholarship
  • Comparative and World Literature
  • Humor Studies and Applications
  • Digital Humanities and Scholarship
  • Geographies of human-animal interactions
  • Gothic Literature and Media Analysis
  • Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books
  • Visual Culture and Art Theory
  • Music History and Culture
  • Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Visual Culture and Art Theory
  • Music History and Culture
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Gender Politics and Representation
  • Art, Politics, and Modernism
  • Art, Politics, and Modernism
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Museums and Cultural Heritage
  • Political and Economic history of UK and US
  • Museums and Cultural Heritage
  • Political and Economic history of UK and US
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
  • Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
  • Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
  • Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
  • Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • humanities

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: