Novos Debates

Associação Brasileira de Antropologia

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Novos Debates is an open-access journal published by Associação Brasileira de Antropologia in Brazil, publishing in PORTUGUESE and ENGLISH and FRENCH and SPANISH. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 30 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Associação Brasileira de Antropologia
ISSN
2358-0097
Country
Brazil
Languages
PORTUGUESE, ENGLISH, FRENCH, SPANISH
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
0
Declared review time
30 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2024-08-30
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
30 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

0

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

30weeks

Works in OpenAlex

353

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

4

i10-index

1

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy10
Last DOAJ review date
2024-08-30
Added to DOAJ
2024-08-30
Declared plagiarism screening
Not declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
PKP PN
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
95%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
39%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity2
Alternate titles
Novos Debates, fórum de antropologia
Source type
journal
Classification2

Subjects (DOAJ)

Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Anthropology

LCC codes

GN1-890

Subject areas

  • Urban and sociocultural dynamics
  • Urban and sociocultural dynamics
  • Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Race, Identity, and Education in Brazil
  • Gender, Sexuality, and Education
  • Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies
  • Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies
  • Gender and Feminist Studies
Show all subjects (75)
  • Arts and Performance Studies
  • Race, Identity, and Education in Brazil
  • Urban Development and Societal Issues
  • Urban Development and Societal Issues
  • Gender, Sexuality, and Education
  • Gender, Sexuality, and Education
  • Arts and Performance Studies
  • Urban and sociocultural dynamics
  • Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
  • Indigenous Studies in Latin America
  • Social and Economic Solidarity
  • Social and Economic Solidarity
  • Literature, Culture, and Criticism
  • Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
  • Race, Identity, and Education in Brazil
  • Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Sociology and Education in Brazil
  • Indigenous Health and Education
  • Indigenous Health and Education
  • Literature, Culture, and Criticism
  • Psychology and Mental Health
  • Psychology and Mental Health
  • Indigenous Studies in Latin America
  • Sports, Gender, and Society
  • Literature, Culture, and Criticism
  • Physical Education and Sports Studies
  • Religion and Society in Latin America
  • Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
  • Indigenous Studies in Latin America
  • Environmental Sustainability and Education
  • Religion and Society in Latin America
  • Environmental Sustainability and Education
  • Afro-Latin American Studies
  • Physical Education and Sports Studies
  • Youth, Drugs, and Violence
  • Education and Public Policy
  • Arts and Performance Studies
  • Education and Public Policy
  • Publishing and Scholarly Communication
  • Youth, Drugs, and Violence
  • LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Physical Education and Sports Studies
  • Brazilian cultural history and politics
  • Rural Development and Agriculture
  • Brazilian cultural history and politics
  • Brazilian cultural history and politics
  • Cultural Identity and Heritage
  • Rural Development and Agriculture
  • Science and Science Education
  • Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
  • Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
  • Science and Science Education
  • Religion and Society in Latin America
  • Linguistics and Education Research
  • Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Sports, Gender, and Society
  • Rural Development and Agriculture
  • Criminal Justice and Penology
  • scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Linguistics and Education Research
  • Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Education and Digital Technologies
  • Development, Ethics, and Society
  • Education and Digital Technologies
  • Business and Management Studies
  • Health, Nursing, Elderly Care

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • anthropology
  • ethnology
  • ethnography

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: