Colloquy: Text, Theory, Critique

Monash University

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Colloquy: Text, Theory, Critique is an open-access journal published by Monash University in Australia, publishing in english. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 26 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Monash University
ISSN
1447-0950 · 1325-9490
Country
Australia
Languages
english
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
30
Declared review time
26 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2018-01-23
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
26 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
No yearly counts available
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

30

Most recent article

19 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

26weeks

Editorial & policy6
Last DOAJ review date
2025-03-31
Added to DOAJ
2018-01-23
Declared plagiarism screening
Not declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity(no data)

No data available to the platform for this group

Classification2

Subjects (DOAJ)

Language and Literature: Literature (General)

LCC codes

PN1-6790

No platform data for: Multi-source verification · Impact metrics · Identity & continuity — absence is not a judgment about the journal.

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • literary studies
  • cultural studies
  • film and television
  • continental philosophy
  • media studies
  • performance studies

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: