Revista de Bioética y Derecho

Universidad de Barcelona

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Revista de Bioética y Derecho is an open-access journal published by Universidad de Barcelona in Spain, publishing in SPANISH and PORTUGUESE and ITALIAN and ENGLISH. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 20 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Universidad de Barcelona
ISSN
1886-5887
Country
Spain
Languages
SPANISH, PORTUGUESE, ITALIAN, ENGLISH
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
744
Declared review time
20 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2018-10-15
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
20 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

744

Most recent article

4 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

20weeks

Works in OpenAlex

399

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

12

i10-index

14

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy8
Last DOAJ review date
2024-10-31
Added to DOAJ
2018-10-15
Declared plagiarism screening
Declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Declared digital preservation
PKP PN
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
CLOCKSSPKP PN
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification4

Subjects (DOAJ)

Law: Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence: Jurisprudence. Philosophy and theory of lawMedicine: Medicine (General): Medical philosophy. Medical ethics

LCC codes

K201-487R723-726

Subject areas

  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Medical and Health Sciences Research
  • Bioethics and Human Rights Issues
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Animal Law and Welfare
Show all subjects (75)
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Health, Medicine and Society
  • Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • Family and Matrimonial Law
  • Animal testing and alternatives
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
  • Bioethics and Human Rights Issues
  • Bioethics and Human Rights Issues
  • Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges
  • Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Law, Ethics, and AI Impact
  • Organ Donation and Transplantation
  • Patient Dignity and Privacy
  • Patient Dignity and Privacy
  • Law, Ethics, and AI Impact
  • Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Public Health in Brazil
  • Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Public Health in Brazil
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Public Health Policies and Education
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
  • Animal testing and alternatives
  • Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
  • Animal testing and alternatives
  • Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Brazilian Legal Issues
  • Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
  • Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
  • Data Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Brazilian Legal Issues
  • Comparative International Legal Studies
  • Comparative International Legal Studies
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Human Rights and Immigration
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Human Rights and Immigration
  • Public Health and Environmental Issues
  • Animal Law and Welfare
  • Animal Law and Welfare
  • Public Health and Environmental Issues
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • bioethics
  • biolaw
  • health
  • human rights
  • animal ethics

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: