Tempo e Argumento

Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Tempo e Argumento is an open-access journal published by Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina in Brazil, publishing in SPANISH and PORTUGUESE and FRENCH and ENGLISH. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 18 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina
ISSN
2175-1803
Country
Brazil
Languages
SPANISH, PORTUGUESE, FRENCH, ENGLISH
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
961
Declared review time
18 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2010-09-23
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
18 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

961

Most recent article

15 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

18weeks

Works in OpenAlex

868

Last recorded publication year

2026

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

13

i10-index

19

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy11
Last DOAJ review date
2025-06-28
Added to DOAJ
2010-09-23
Declared plagiarism screening
Declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Declared digital preservation
LOCKSSPKP PN
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
PKP PN
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
62%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
100%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification3

Subjects (DOAJ)

History (General) and history of Europe: History (General): Modern history, 1453-

LCC codes

D1-2009D204-475

Subject areas

  • Brazilian cultural history and politics
  • Brazilian cultural history and politics
  • Brazilian cultural history and politics
  • Philosophy, History, and Historiography
  • Memory, violence, and history
  • Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies
  • Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies
  • Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
Show all subjects (75)
  • Urban Development and Societal Issues
  • Urban Development and Societal Issues
  • History of Education Research in Brazil
  • History of Education Research in Brazil
  • Youth, Politics, and Society
  • Youth, Politics, and Society
  • Urban and sociocultural dynamics
  • Urban and sociocultural dynamics
  • History of Education Research in Brazil
  • Memory, violence, and history
  • Memory, violence, and history
  • Gender, Sexuality, and Education
  • Memory, Trauma, and Testimony
  • Memory, Trauma, and Testimony
  • Gender, Sexuality, and Education
  • Sociology and Education in Brazil
  • Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America
  • Literature, Culture, and Criticism
  • Literature, Culture, and Criticism
  • Sociology and Education in Brazil
  • Sociology and Education in Brazil
  • Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America
  • Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America
  • Argentine historical studies
  • Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
  • Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
  • Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
  • Social and Political Issues
  • Social and Political Issues
  • Education Pedagogy and Practices
  • Education Pedagogy and Practices
  • Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
  • Latin American socio-political dynamics
  • Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis
  • Media, Journalism, and Communication History
  • Race, Identity, and Education in Brazil
  • Literature, Culture, and Criticism
  • Memory, History, Trauma, Identity
  • Race, Identity, and Education in Brazil
  • Historical Studies in Latin America
  • Race, Identity, and Education in Brazil
  • Cultural Identity and Heritage
  • Education and Digital Technologies
  • Education and Digital Technologies
  • Autobiographical and Biographical Writing
  • Linguistics and Education Research
  • Linguistics and Education Research
  • History of Colonial Brazil
  • Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
  • History of Colonial Brazil
  • Communism, Protests, Social Movements
  • Gender, Sexuality, and Education
  • Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
  • Brazilian Legal Issues
  • Brazilian Legal Issues
  • Cinema History and Criticism
  • Politics and Society in Latin America
  • Argentine historical studies
  • Argentine historical studies
  • Politics and Society in Latin America
  • Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
  • Religion and Society in Latin America
  • Religion and Society in Latin America
  • Digital and Traditional Archives Management
  • Rural Development and Agriculture
  • Rural Development and Agriculture

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • history
  • contemporary history
  • modern history

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: