Revista Tradumàtica

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Revista Tradumàtica is an open-access journal published by Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona in Spain, publishing in spanish and english and catalan. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 36 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
ISSN
1578-7559
Country
Spain
Languages
spanish, english, catalan
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
216
Declared review time
36 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2021-02-18
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
36 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

216

Most recent article

7 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

36weeks

Works in OpenAlex

217

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 2 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

16

i10-index

32

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy11
Last DOAJ review date
2026-03-12
Added to DOAJ
2021-02-18
Declared plagiarism screening
Not declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Declared digital preservation
PKP PN
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
PKP PN
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
100%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
28%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification2

Subjects (DOAJ)

Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics: Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar: Translating and interpreting

LCC codes

P306-310

Subject areas

  • Translation Studies and Practices
  • Translation Studies and Practices
  • Translation Studies and Practices
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
  • linguistics and terminology studies
Show all subjects (75)
  • linguistics and terminology studies
  • Foreign Language Teaching Methods
  • Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
  • Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
  • Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
  • Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
  • Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • linguistics and terminology studies
  • Topic Modeling
  • Topic Modeling
  • Lexicography and Language Studies
  • Text Readability and Simplification
  • E-Learning and Knowledge Management
  • E-Learning and Knowledge Management
  • Text Readability and Simplification
  • Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies
  • Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies
  • Text Readability and Simplification
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Usability and User Interface Design
  • Educational Technology in Learning
  • Open Source Software Innovations
  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • Educational Technology in Learning
  • Digital Humanities and Scholarship
  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • English Language Learning and Teaching
  • Topic Modeling
  • Publishing and Scholarly Communication
  • Legal and Regulatory Analysis
  • Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies
  • Galician and Iberian cultural studies
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Military Technology and Strategies
  • Mobile Learning in Education
  • Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Military Technology and Strategies
  • Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation
  • Legal and Regulatory Analysis
  • Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies
  • Galician and Iberian cultural studies
  • Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation
  • Wikis in Education and Collaboration
  • Web and Library Services
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Wikis in Education and Collaboration
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Wikis in Education and Collaboration
  • Mobile and Web Applications
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
  • Web and Library Services
  • Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation
  • Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • information technology
  • machine translation
  • localization
  • interpreting technologies
  • translation technologies

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: