AI-Linguistica

PUBLIA – SLUB Open Publishing

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

AI-Linguistica is an open-access journal published by PUBLIA – SLUB Open Publishing in Germany, publishing in english and german and french and italian. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 10 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
PUBLIA – SLUB Open Publishing
ISSN
2943-0070
Country
Germany
Languages
english, german, french, italian
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
40
Declared review time
10 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2025-05-26
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
10 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

40

Most recent article

2 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

10weeks

Works in OpenAlex

44

Last recorded publication year

2026

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

3

i10-index

0

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy11
Last DOAJ review date
2025-06-20
Added to DOAJ
2025-05-26
Declared plagiarism screening
Not declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Declared digital preservation
PKP PN
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
PKP PN
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
32%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
83%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification2

Subjects (DOAJ)

Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics: Computational linguistics. Natural language processing

LCC codes

P98-98.5

Subject areas

  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Linguistic research and analysis
  • Text Readability and Simplification
  • Topic Modeling
  • Text Readability and Simplification
  • Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Show all subjects (75)
  • Topic Modeling
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Topic Modeling
  • Text Readability and Simplification
  • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition
  • Authorship Attribution and Profiling
  • Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Translation Studies and Practices
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Language and cultural evolution
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Language and cultural evolution
  • Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • linguistics and terminology studies
  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • linguistics and terminology studies
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
  • Literary and Philosophical Studies
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Translation Studies and Practices
  • Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
  • Digital Communication and Language
  • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Authorship Attribution and Profiling
  • Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Cybernetics and Technology in Society
  • Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
  • Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
  • Translation Studies and Practices
  • linguistics and terminology studies
  • Digital Communication and Language
  • Authorship Attribution and Profiling
  • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
  • Cultural and political discourse analysis
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • French Urban and Social Studies
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • French Urban and Social Studies
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • automated texts
  • generative ai
  • romance languages
  • linguistics
  • texts and discourses
  • germanic languages

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: