Philosophies

MDPI AG

Journal websitePeer review: Other
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Philosophies is an open-access journal published by MDPI AG in Switzerland, publishing in english. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared publication charge: 1,400 CHF. Declared review time at DOAJ: 6 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
MDPI AG
ISSN
2409-9287
Country
Switzerland
Languages
english
Access
Open access
Declared publication charge
1,400 CHF
Articles in DOAJ
1011
Declared review time
6 weeks
Declared peer-review model
other

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2017-04-12
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
1,400 CHF
Declared review time (DOAJ)
6 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

1011

Most recent article

2 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

6weeks

Works in OpenAlex

999

Last recorded publication year

2026

Reported by OpenAlex in 2 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

25

i10-index

115

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy13
Last DOAJ review date
2024-06-06
Added to DOAJ
2017-04-12
Declared plagiarism screening
Declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Declared digital preservation
CLOCKSS
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
CLOCKSS
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Norwegian register (HK-dir)— 2026
Level 1 — approved scholarly channel
Open references deposited at Crossref
99%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
69%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
APC waiver policy
View policy
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification4

Subjects (DOAJ)

Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: LogicPhilosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)

LCC codes

BC1-199B1-5802

Subject areas

  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Show all subjects (75)
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
  • Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
  • Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
  • Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Free Will and Agency
  • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Free Will and Agency
  • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
  • Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
  • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
  • Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
  • Medieval and Classical Philosophy
  • Doping in Sports
  • Doping in Sports
  • Medieval and Classical Philosophy
  • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
  • Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality
  • Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
  • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
  • Posthumanist Ethics and Activism

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • logic
  • philosophy of science
  • epistemology
  • philosophy

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: