Open Philosophy

De Gruyter

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Open Philosophy is an open-access journal published by De Gruyter in Poland, publishing in english. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared publication charge: 1,050 EUR. Declared review time at DOAJ: 40 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
De Gruyter
ISSN
2543-8875
Country
Poland
Languages
english
Access
Open access
Declared publication charge
1,050 EUR
Articles in DOAJ
405
Declared review time
40 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2019-02-25
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
1,050 EUR
Declared review time (DOAJ)
40 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

405

Most recent article

last month

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

40weeks

Works in OpenAlex

384

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 2 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

14

i10-index

21

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy13
Last DOAJ review date
2026-07-24
Added to DOAJ
2019-02-25
Declared plagiarism screening
Declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Declared digital preservation
Portico
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
Portico
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Norwegian register (HK-dir)— 2026
Level 1 — approved scholarly channel
Open references deposited at Crossref
95%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
10%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
APC waiver policy
View policy
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification2

Subjects (DOAJ)

Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)

LCC codes

B1-5802

Subject areas

  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
  • Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis
  • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
Show all subjects (75)
  • Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
  • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
  • Philosophy and Historical Thought
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Critical Theory and Philosophy
  • Critical Theory and Philosophy
  • Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
  • Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Marxism and Critical Theory
  • Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
  • Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
  • Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Art, Politics, and Modernism
  • Cybernetics and Technology in Society
  • Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
  • Sound Studies and Aurality
  • Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
  • Art, Aesthetics, and Perception
  • Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
  • Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
  • Geographies of human-animal interactions
  • Geographies of human-animal interactions
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
  • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
  • Visual Culture and Art Theory
  • Visual Culture and Art Theory
  • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
  • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
  • Critical Theory and Philosophy
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Art, Politics, and Modernism
  • Political Theology and Sovereignty
  • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
  • Art, Politics, and Modernism
  • Political Theology and Sovereignty
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy
  • Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy
  • Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
  • Philosophy and Historical Thought
  • Critical Theory and Political Philosophy
  • Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis
  • Humanities and Social Sciences
  • Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis
  • Cinema and Media Studies
  • Humanities and Social Sciences
  • Cinema and Media Studies
  • Philosophy and Historical Thought
  • War, Ethics, and Justification
  • Philosophy and Phenomenology Studies
  • War, Ethics, and Justification
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
  • Embodied and Extended Cognition

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • philosophy

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: