Philosophy of Medicine

University Library System, University of Pittsburgh

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Philosophy of Medicine is an open-access journal published by University Library System, University of Pittsburgh in United States, publishing in english. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 12 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
ISSN
2692-3963
Country
United States
Languages
english
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
83
Declared review time
12 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2022-05-04
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
12 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

83

Most recent article

2 months ago

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

12weeks

Works in OpenAlex

234

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 2 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

14

i10-index

21

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy11
Last DOAJ review date
2026-07-24
Added to DOAJ
2022-05-04
Declared plagiarism screening
Not declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Declared digital preservation
LOCKSSPKP PN
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
PKP PN
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
6%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
100%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity3
Alternate titles
PM
Source type
journal
NLM unique ID (PubMed)
9918956360806676
Classification2

Subjects (DOAJ)

Medicine: Medicine (General): Medical philosophy. Medical ethics

LCC codes

R723-726

Subject areas

  • Medicine, History, and Philosophy
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • History of Science and Medicine
Show all subjects (75)
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Empathy and Medical Education
  • Empathy and Medical Education
  • History of Medicine Studies
  • Empathy and Medical Education
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Neurology and Historical Studies
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Neurology and Historical Studies
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Public Health Policies and Education
  • Foucault, Power, and Ethics
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
  • Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Historical and modern epidemiology studies
  • Medical Research and Treatments
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Health, Medicine and Society
  • Medical Research and Treatments
  • History of Medicine Studies
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • History of Medicine Studies
  • Health, Medicine and Society
  • Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Chinese history and philosophy
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Foucault, Power, and Ethics
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Foucault, Power, and Ethics
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • medicine
  • philosophy
  • medical philosophy

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: