EccoS – Revista Científica

Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

EccoS – Revista Científica is an open-access journal published by Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove in Brazil, publishing in french and german and spanish and english. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared review time at DOAJ: 24 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove
ISSN
1517-1949 · 1983-9278
Country
Brazil
Languages
french, german, spanish, english
Access
Open access
Articles in DOAJ
1671
Declared review time
24 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2025-03-01
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
—
Declared review time (DOAJ)
24 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

1671

Most recent article

last month

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

24weeks

Works in OpenAlex

1501

Last recorded publication year

2026

Reported by OpenAlex in 1 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

22

i10-index

57

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy11
Last DOAJ review date
2025-03-01
Added to DOAJ
2025-03-01
Declared plagiarism screening
Declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Declared digital preservation
LOCKSS
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
PKP PN
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Open references deposited at Crossref
92%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
100%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification2

Subjects (DOAJ)

General Works: History of scholarship and learning. The humanities

LCC codes

AZ20-999

Subject areas

  • Education Pedagogy and Practices
  • Education Pedagogy and Practices
  • Education Pedagogy and Practices
  • Education and Public Policy
  • Education and Public Policy
  • Education and Digital Technologies
  • Education and Digital Technologies
  • Rural and Ethnic Education
Show all subjects (75)
  • Rural and Ethnic Education
  • Education and Public Policy
  • Social and Political Issues
  • Social and Political Issues
  • Critical and Liberation Pedagogy
  • Business and Management Studies
  • Business and Management Studies
  • Higher Education in Latin America
  • History of Education Research in Brazil
  • Linguistics and Education Research
  • Linguistics and Education Research
  • Academic Research in Diverse Fields
  • Academic Research in Diverse Fields
  • Race, Identity, and Education in Brazil
  • Environmental Sustainability and Education
  • Environmental Sustainability and Education
  • Science and Education Research
  • Science and Education Research
  • Youth, Politics, and Society
  • Global Educational Policies and Reforms
  • Youth, Politics, and Society
  • Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies
  • Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies
  • Sociology and Education in Brazil
  • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Higher Education Governance and Development
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Educational Practices and Policies
  • Linguistics and Education Research
  • Gender, Sexuality, and Education
  • Education, Philosophy, and Society
  • Historical Education Studies Worldwide
  • Science and Science Education
  • Arts and Performance Studies
  • Social and Economic Solidarity
  • Education, Politics, and Culture Studies
  • Art Education and Development
  • Arts and Performance Studies
  • Social and Economic Solidarity
  • Science and Science Education
  • Psychology and Mental Health
  • Psychology and Mental Health
  • Educational Practices and Policies
  • Educational Practices and Policies
  • Brazilian cultural history and politics
  • Brazilian cultural history and politics
  • Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Urban and sociocultural dynamics
  • Urban and sociocultural dynamics
  • Urban Development and Societal Issues
  • Urban Development and Societal Issues
  • Rural Development and Agriculture
  • Rural Development and Agriculture
  • Politics, Economics, and Education Policy
  • Brazilian Legal Issues
  • Rural and Ethnic Education
  • Brazilian Legal Issues
  • Education and Digital Technologies
  • Race, Identity, and Education in Brazil
  • Race, Identity, and Education in Brazil
  • Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
  • Historical Education and Society
  • History of Education Research in Brazil
  • History of Education Research in Brazil
  • Science and Education Research
  • Literacy and Educational Practices

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • education
  • teachers
  • knowledge
  • learning
  • social sciences
  • humanities

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: