Frontline Learning Research

EARLI

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

Frontline Learning Research is an open-access journal published by EARLI in Belgium, publishing in english. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared publication charge: 200 EUR. Declared review time at DOAJ: 35 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
EARLI
ISSN
2295-3159
Country
Belgium
Languages
english
Access
Open access
Declared publication charge
200 EUR
Articles in DOAJ
278
Declared review time
35 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2021-06-16
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
200 EUR
Declared review time (DOAJ)
35 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

278

Most recent article

last month

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

35weeks

Works in OpenAlex

304

Last recorded publication year

2025

Reported by OpenAlex in 2 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

37

i10-index

143

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy11
Last DOAJ review date
2021-06-16
Added to DOAJ
2021-06-16
Declared plagiarism screening
Not declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Declared digital preservation
PKP PN
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Norwegian register (HK-dir)— 2026
Level 1 — approved scholarly channel
Open references deposited at Crossref
0%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
80%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification2

Subjects (DOAJ)

Education

LCC codes

L

Subject areas

  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Show all subjects (75)
  • Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Online and Blended Learning
  • Online and Blended Learning
  • Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Educational Research and Methods
  • Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Higher Education Research Studies
  • Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Higher Education Practises and Engagement
  • Higher Education Practises and Engagement
  • Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Higher Education Research Studies
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Higher Education Research Studies
  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Parental Involvement in Education
  • Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Parental Involvement in Education
  • Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Digital Education and Society
  • Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • School Choice and Performance
  • Online and Blended Learning
  • Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
  • Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
  • Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Higher Education and Employability
  • Higher Education and Employability
  • Team Dynamics and Performance

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • learning
  • instruction
  • education
  • qualitative methods
  • quantitative methods
  • educational psychology

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: