International Journal for Educational Integrity

BMC

Journal websitePeer review: Double-blind review
Evaluation status available after sign-in

About the journal

International Journal for Educational Integrity is an open-access journal published by BMC in United Kingdom, publishing in english. It is listed in DOAJ according to the sources read. Declared publication charge: 1,140 EUR. Declared review time at DOAJ: 22 weeks. Facts are reproduced as recorded at their sources with their capture dates; PublishLens indicators are available after sign-in.

Basic facts

Publisher
BMC
ISSN
1833-2595
Country
United Kingdom
Languages
english
Access
Open access
Declared publication charge
1,140 EUR
Articles in DOAJ
220
Declared review time
22 weeks
Declared peer-review model
double_blind

Index listings

  • DOAJ · 2016-11-10
Indexing
DOAJ
APC
1,140 EUR
Declared review time (DOAJ)
22 weeks — journal-declared only (not measured)
Activity (OpenAlex)
Active — latest works 2026
PublishLens list status
Shown after sign-in
Counts for promotion at your university?
Choose your university and rank below ↓

Methodology signals (dated facts from their sources)

Details of the evaluation under the published methodology are shown to signed-in users (free).

Create a free account to view the evaluation

Journal profile

Descriptive metadata from public sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, PubMed) as of the capture date shown — contains no assessment or judgment.

Articles in DOAJ

220

Most recent article

last month

Average review time (journal-declared via DOAJ)

22weeks

Works in OpenAlex

346

Last recorded publication year

2026

Reported by OpenAlex in 2 of 3 sources (CC0 flags, not verified indexing)DOAJSciELOOpenAlex Core

h-index

52

i10-index

199

From OpenAlex open data (CC0).

Editorial & policy13
Last DOAJ review date
2026-03-17
Added to DOAJ
2016-11-10
Declared plagiarism screening
Declared
Other fees beyond APC
No
Declared digital preservation
CLOCKSS
Observed digital preservation (Keepers registry)— snapshot 2026-10-05
CLOCKSSPortico
Editorial board
Official page ↗
Norwegian register (HK-dir)— 2026
Level 1 — approved scholarly channel
Open references deposited at Crossref
99%
ORCID iDs in current deposits
43%
Enrolled in Crossref Similarity Check
✓
Deposits licence metadata at Crossref
✓
APC waiver policy
View policy
Peer-review policy
View policy
Identity & continuity1
Source type
journal
Classification2

Subjects (DOAJ)

Education: Theory and practice of education

LCC codes

LB5-3640

Subject areas

  • Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Show all subjects (75)
  • Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Legal Issues in Education
  • Higher Education Governance and Development
  • Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Legal Education and Practice Innovations
  • Legal Education and Practice Innovations
  • Publishing and Scholarly Communication
  • Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
  • Education, Philosophy, and Society
  • Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Higher Education Practises and Engagement
  • Higher Education Practises and Engagement
  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Academic Freedom and Politics
  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Online and Blended Learning
  • Authorship Attribution and Profiling
  • Digital Education and Society
  • Online and Blended Learning
  • scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Online and Blended Learning
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Higher Education Research Studies
  • scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Higher Education Practises and Engagement
  • Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Higher Education Governance and Development
  • Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Higher Education Governance and Development
  • Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Academic Freedom and Politics
  • Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Academic Freedom and Politics
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Higher Education Learning Practices
  • Reflective Practices in Education
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Medical Education and Admissions
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Reflective Practices in Education
  • Medical Education and Admissions
  • Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Higher Education Learning Practices
  • Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Topic Modeling
  • Topic Modeling

Keywords (DOAJ)

  • pedagogy
  • academic standards
  • cheating
  • plagiarism
  • ethics
  • behavioural ethics

Community confirmations — what users saw in MJL or Scopus Sources; not platform verification and never part of any score.

Loading community confirmations…
How do we evaluate?Publisher of this journal? Appeal a derived assessment or request a factual correction

The journal's record in other sources:Web of Science MJLDOAJ

Everything shown here is produced automatically from named sources (DOAJ, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, the Norwegian register) as of its capture date, with no human editing. Facts appear as recorded at the source; derived scores (PCI, PTD, PublishLens score) follow a published methodology. Not a judgement on the journal, not an official accreditation, not advice.

Wrong items are corrected automatically by re-reading the source (24 h for daily sources, 7 days for weekly ones) with a dated change log, and each item links to its source record. PublishLens-derived assessments are contested through the appeals mechanism (15 working days). Appeals · Indicator guide

Norwegian register data: Kanalregisteret (HK-dir, Norway) — CC BY 4.0 / NLOD — adapted: level extracted per year · OASPA member list — CC BY

Last automated source read: